Those Front Steps

[Alan Ford]

Sorry Alan, this is your thread and in your OP it's your claim, it's always been your claim, read em and weep. And the only proof so far is that in your "opinion" it doesn't look right, as I said this is not very scientific and is just crazy, either provide proof or Royell will make me the new champion and you wouldn't what that, would you?

JohnM

Oh dear oh dear oh dear, that it should come to this.

"I, Mr John Mytton, have a simple rational explanation for the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady in Wiegman: it's a natural shadow from the western column. As to where that shadow actually fell in the entranceway? Don't ask me because I haven't a clue."

Mr John Mytton's Reputation, R.I.P. 

[Alan Ford]

Friends, now that Mr Mytton's claim that the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady's right side in Wiegman is a natural shadow has ended in humiliated exhaustion for poor Mr Mytton, where are we?

Well, we are left with that dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady's side in Wiegman:



No one has be able to explain it as a natural phenomenon.

Anyone else want to try?

 

[John Mytton]

Oh dear oh dear oh dear, that it should come to this.

"I, Mr John Mytton, have a simple rational explanation for the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady in Wiegman: it's a natural shadow from the western column. As to where that shadow actually fell in the entranceway? Don't ask me because I haven't a clue."

Mr John Mytton's Reputation, R.I.P. 

Stop shifting the burden of proof, your claim your proof.

Mr Oswald, who is still just a step above Mr Carl Edward Jones, but now slightly more eastwards, has been blacked out of the Wiegman film (the impossible dark strip down Mr Lovelady's right side!)

JohnM

[Alan Ford]

Stop shifting the burden of proof, your claim your proof.


JohnM

You don't want to talk about the shadow anymore, Mr Mytton. We quite understand! 

[John Mytton]

You don't want to talk about the shadow anymore, Mr Mytton. We quite understand! 

It's never been my shadow, you made a claim and now you want other people to prove your claim, in which alternate Universe does that make sense.
It's obvious from day 1 that you think you see something but you have no idea how to prove it.
But you seem to think the solution is to make post after post after post with a thousand emoticons and somehow all your dreams will all come true, nice!

JohnM

[Alan Ford]

Friends, now that Mr Mytton's claim that the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady's right side in Wiegman is a natural shadow has ended in humiliated exhaustion for poor Mr Mytton, where are we?

Well, we are left with that dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady's side in Wiegman:



No one has be able to explain it as a natural phenomenon.

Anyone else want to try?

 

Now! If it remains the case that the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady in Wiegman cannot be explained as a natural phenomenon, it follows that it is an unnatural phenomenon
-------------i.e. the Wiegman film was altered.

Yes? Yes! 

And if the Wiegman film was altered, then it follows that whoever altered it must have had a reason for altering it.

Yes? Yes! 

Now! I know what that reason is:

Mr Lee Harvey Oswald was just behind Mr Lovelady at the time of the assassination.



It's where he claimed he was--------------Agent Hosty's handwritten interrogation notes: "Then went outside to watch P. parade"--------------and it's where he indeed was. 

But! Maybe I've got this all wrong! Maybe the Wiegman film was altered for some reason that had nothing whatsoever to do with Mr Oswald!

OK. Well, now that the 'natural shadow' counter-explanation for Wiegman has died a gruesome final death (thanking you again, Mr Mytton!  ), perhaps someone can offer a counter-explanation for the doctoring of the Wiegman film?

If no one can, then it looks like the mystery of Mr Oswald's whereabouts is solved-----------56 long years after the assassination!

 

[Alan Ford]

It's never been my shadow

~Snicker~

Bye bye, Mr Mytton!