Those Front Steps

[Chris Davidson]

[Chris Davidson]

Same event, different camera position.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dIWUwWREt2jy7ecTEY8kWDhfzG3x8Fay/view?usp=sharing

[John Mytton]

Honest, Non-Myttonian Version + Dishonest Myttonian Version A

Unbelievable, I just noticed you didn't use my latest up to date version but you dug through my history and compared my very first graphic(version A) and knowing that I made more accurate versions you still persisted in making a fraudulent comparison, hey whatever it takes right?

JohnM

[Thomas Graves]

Unbelievable, I just noticed you didn't use my latest up to date version but you dug through my history and compared my very first graphic(version A) and knowing that I made more accurate versions you still persisted in making a fraudulent comparison, hey whatever it takes right?

JohnM

He's desperate for recognition, John.

--  MWT 

[John Mytton]

He's desperate for recognition, John.

--  MWT 

Yes, Alan's keen on cherry picking some minor detail that he perceives to be faulty, like a date or a shadow, and then he'll build an entire conspiracy theory around it and it doesn't matter if it makes any sense or not or even if it's physically possible or not because the big bad Government is so advanced they can do anything, well that is besides hiding a conspiracy or delivering his dole check on time.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Unbelievable, I just noticed you didn't use my latest up to date version but you dug through my history and compared my very first graphic(version A) and knowing that I made more accurate versions you still persisted in making a fraudulent comparison, hey whatever it takes right?

JohnM

      "More ACCURATE versions" ??  Why not just admit Your version was INCORRECT?  There is CORRECT and INCORRECT. You play around with the Images and your work product is going to reflect this Manipulation. INCORRECT Version(s) = INCORRECT Conclusion(s).

[John Mytton]

      "More ACCURATE versions" ??  Why not just admit Your version was INCORRECT?  There is CORRECT and INCORRECT. You play around with the Images and your work product is going to reflect this Manipulation. INCORRECT Version(s) = INCORRECT Conclusion(s).

You really don't get it, there can never be a CORRECT version because NONE of these cameras were in the EXACT same location or were all using the EXACT same lenses, therefore there can never be a CORRECT version, then on top of that is the poisoned well of bad video transfers, Pal copies, distorted images, manipulated images and so on which finally means that by definition there will always only be INCORRECT versions, but that doesn't mean that 95% accuracy can't be used to derive a logical conclusion.

JohnM