Those Front Steps

[John Mytton]

Now!

How did Mr Mytton solve the 'PrayerPersonInWiegman' problem in his second version----------which was created in response to the observation that the figures in Wiegman in his first version were much smaller than the figures in Darnell?

Easy-----------------he got rid of 'PrayerPersonInWiegman' altogether by keeping 'PrayerPersonInDarnell' embedded in the 'Wiegman' frame!

Look at what happens to PrayerPerson in the images below. They tell quite a story!

Honest, Non-Myttonian Version + Dishonest Myttonian Version A



Dishonest Myttonian Version B with nothing of 'PrayerPersonInWiegman' but the bright dot:


 
He realised that having 'PrayerPersonInWiegman' climbing up the west wall might be a problem!

What an absolute scam artist this man is!

Hilarious, the more frustrated you become the more angry words just pour out.

For a start your non-mytton version has been squeezed horizontally to squeeze Lovelady closer to the railing, have you got even one honest bone in your body? I already told you that there were altered images on the web and now you're attempting to use them to your own advantage. naughty naughty!

But even with your "manipulated" image when the railing is made clear, Lovelady is behind and to the left, behind and to the left. Whichever way you look at this problem, the outcome is always the same. You lose! Did you ever think that painting in a shadow was going to trump reality?



JohnM

[Alan Ford]

He's still placing the railing in the wrong place! 

[John Mytton]

He's still placing the railing in the wrong place! 

Really? You can show me where I went wrong, yes?







JohnM

[John Mytton]

     You know better than to manipulate image(s) to try and prove whatever your point might be. Ford caught You cold and now you gotta live with having been Exposed. Your visual aids past, present, and future now carry this Stain.

Every comparison image I used, came from either this thread or from Google images and if you can't prove that I manipulated even 1 image I expect a full apology.

Your visual aids past, present, and future now carry this Stain.

Every image I have ever posted has been under intense scrutiny, it goes with the job.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Hilarious, the more frustrated you become the more angry words just pour out.

For a start your non-mytton version has been squeezed horizontally to squeeze Lovelady closer to the railing, have you got even one honest bone in your body? I already told you that there were altered images on the web and now you're attempting to use them to your own advantage. naughty naughty!

But even with your "manipulated" image when the railing is made clear, Lovelady is behind and to the left, behind and to the left. Whichever way you look at this problem, the outcome is always the same. You lose! Did you ever think that painting in a shadow was going to trump reality?



JohnM

      Why don't You just Stop altering JFK Assassination Images?

[John Mytton]

      Why don't You just Stop altering JFK Assassination Images?

I knew you couldn't prove what didn't happen, I demand a full apology for your unwarranted smear.

Btw in the last couple of days a bunch of Kooks keep giving me advice but why is it always to your advantage.

JohnM

[Chris Davidson]