Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 406751 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #301 on: November 14, 2019, 07:33:44 AM »
So anyone who questions Alan Fords theory of the day, is one of the above?

Anyone who tries to explain away the magic 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady in the ridiculous way you have done, Mr Mason, certainly is!  Thumb1:

Offline Matthew Finch

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #302 on: November 14, 2019, 01:10:43 PM »
Thank you very much for this, Mr Davidson! (How do you always seem to have such excellent versions of footage? It's wonderful!)  Thumb1:

Now!

What we're seeing here, in greater clarity than in the version of the Wiegman frames I have been posting, is that

------------------Mr Lovelady is stationary
------------------Mr Oswald (just behind him) is moving, one assumes because he is trying to get a better look at what's going on out on the street.


The Altgens photograph is taken at or around one of the points seen above (early frames!) where Mr Oswald's head is just to the left (=our right, i.e. east!) of Mr Lovelady's head. And Altgens shows a portion of Mr Oswald's head/face:



Furthermore!

There is a lot of white t-shirt in the Oswald/Lovelady ensemble in Wiegman. Look closely and you will see that Mr Oswald appears to be wearing only his white t-shirt (no shirt!).

Had a dark vertical strip not been added to Mr Lovelady's right side, Mr Oswald's white t-shirt (and exposed right arm, and----who knows?-----maybe even a soda bottle in the right hand) would be all too evident even to a casual viewer. Which of course is why a dark vertical strip was added to Mr Lovelady's right side!

This latter observation------------Mr Oswald in a white tshirt only------------suggests that Mr Oswald is not Prayer Man in the Darnell film after all.

Which in turn means that it's perfectly possible that only one person noticed Mr Oswald in the few moments he spent out front for the motorcade:

Mr Frazier.

Like I say, what a heavy burden to have to carry. No wonder Captain Fritz hung the threat of a charge of conspiracy to murder JFK over him!


Looks like the aerial of the passing car is also causing interference with that 'flat-edged black shadow'...

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #303 on: November 14, 2019, 04:13:47 PM »


A very good illustration showing the DPD UniformedOfficer/Image with the white helmet stepping out of the landing's west side vertical shadow.
« Last Edit: November 14, 2019, 04:18:39 PM by Larry Trotter »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5704
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #304 on: November 14, 2019, 04:22:34 PM »
A very good illustration showing the DPD UniformedOfficer/Image with the white helmet stepping out of the landing's west side vertical shadow.

   Again, the absence of Light does Not automatically = a Shadow. This would be like claiming to be standing in a Shadow if you were situated inside a CAVE.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #305 on: November 14, 2019, 05:02:10 PM »
   Again, the absence of Light does Not automatically = a Shadow. This would be like claiming to be standing in a Shadow if you were situated inside a CAVE.

The WiegmanFilm clip being discussed is of the TSBD Bldg Elm St entrance portal, facing south, and slightly southeast, at about 12:30pm CST, on 11/22/'63, about 2000 miles north of the equator.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5704
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #306 on: November 14, 2019, 05:06:04 PM »
The WiegmanFilm clip being discussed is of the TSBD Bldg Elm St entrance portal, facing south, and slightly southeast, at about 12:30pm CST, on 11/22/'63, about 2000 miles north of the equator.

    No. We are talking about a Cop. This explains your erroneous conclusion(s). Please Focus

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #307 on: November 14, 2019, 05:16:10 PM »
    No. We are talking about a Cop. This explains your erroneous conclusion(s). Please Focus

You need not to be concerned about my focus, the discussion centers on a shaded area in WiegmanFilm. Mr Davidson's posted film clip offers a perfect corroborating illustration.
If agreement you seek, keep looking.