Those Front Steps

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 359032 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #133 on: October 23, 2019, 05:13:01 AM »
The first point to note is that now you accept that that's Mr Frazier in Wiegman. Progress!  Thumb1:

Now!

Question 1!

Did you not actually bother to study this gif, which offers a slowed down rendition of the Wiegman frames?



Are you seriously telling me that Mr Frazier had time to be the source of the second 'Lovelady' head?

Question 2!!

What height was Mr Frazier? What height was Mr Lovelady? What height was Mr Oswald?

Who is the more reasonable candidate, on grounds of height alone, for the second 'Lovelady' head?



100% correct!  Now relate this to the above points, as well as to Mr Oswald's claim to have gone 'outside to watch P. parade', and the mystery of why that magic 'shadow' is there is solved.

Thumb1:

      The Wiegman footage occurs Before the Darnell footage. If Frazier's initial position is 1 of the 2 heads, he then has the time to move a few feet where we see him positioned on the Darnell footage. You are so eager to buy into 1 of the heads belonging to Oswald, that you are Failing to consider alternate possibilities.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #134 on: October 23, 2019, 01:32:59 PM »
I don't need to point out the two "bars" visible in the woman's skirt

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

 :D

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #135 on: October 23, 2019, 05:13:18 PM »
    We can resolve this quickly IF You will go on-the-record with what you believe the time interval is between the Wiegman footage of your alleged 2 Heads and the Darnell Footage showing Buell Frazier at the Top of the TSBD Steps. Go ahead.......... I "Triple Dog Dare You"

But we already have resolved it, Mr Storing, because Mr Frazier is already visible in the Wiegman film:



His presence there in Darnell (~30 seconds later) is merely further confirmation that the tall Elvis-combed figure in Wiegman was not Pauline Sanders or Bill Shelley!



And the blacking out in Wiegman leads us to the inescapable inference that the second 'Lovelady' head (to our left)--------------



-------------belongs to the man the Lone Nutters still want us to believe was up at the sixth floor southeast window having just shot JFK!

 Thumb1:

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #136 on: October 23, 2019, 05:30:22 PM »
But we already have resolved it, Mr Storing, because Mr Frazier is already visible in the Wiegman film:



His presence there in Darnell (~30 seconds later) is merely further confirmation that the tall Elvis-combed figure in Wiegman was not Pauline Sanders or Bill Shelley!



And the blacking out in Wiegman leads us to the inescapable inference that the second 'Lovelady' head (to our left)--------------



-------------belongs to the man the Lone Nutters still want us to believe was up at the sixth floor southeast window having just shot JFK!

 Thumb1:

    Your Positively ID'ing whomever/whatever is inside that bluish circle is You once again stating Your Opinion as if it were fact.  Be honest. YOU can Not see precisely what is inside that circle. That image is far to sketchy to permit a Positive ID. Your admitting to a roughly 30 second time gap between: (1) the alleged 2 Heads Wiegman still frame, and (2) the Darnell footage showing Frazier at the top of the steps = plenty of time for Frazier to have changed his position on the steps. In the affidavit that Frazier filed on 11/22/63 he stated, "I was Standing ON the front steps of the building when the parade came by". Frazier could possibly be 1 of your alleged 2 Heads.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #137 on: October 23, 2019, 05:40:04 PM »
    Your Positively ID'ing whomever/whatever is inside that bluish circle is You once again stating Your Opinion as if it were fact.  Be honest. YOU can Not see precisely what is inside that circle. That image is far to sketchy to permit a Positive ID. Your admitting to a roughly 30 second time gap between: (1) the alleged 2 Heads Wiegman still frame, and (2) the Darnell footage showing Frazier at the top of the steps = plenty of time for Frazier to have changed his position on the steps. In the affidavit that Frazier filed on 11/22/63 he stated, "I was Standing ON the front steps of the building when the parade came by". Frazier could possibly be 1 of your alleged 2 Heads.

Oh dear oh dear oh dear, Mr Storing. You swing between affirming Mr Frazier's identity in Wiegman-----------------so that you can argue he had 'time' to lunge forward and be the second 'Lovelady' head------------------to querying it.

You are defying common sense by once again reverting to the argument that Mr Frazier in Wiegman might not be Mr Frazier in Darnell:





It's blindingly obvious we're seeing the same tall dark-haired figure with the distinctive Elvis hair!

Who else do you think this tall dark-haired figure with the distinctive Elvis hair in Wiegman might possibly be? A name would be great!  Thumb1:

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #138 on: October 23, 2019, 05:50:46 PM »
Yeah, that’s what I thought.

 :D

John,

Here's the whole post. You left the highlighted part out.

"I don't need to point out the two "bars" visible in the woman's skirt in the Darnell frame on page 20 to people who can see, who know where to find that sliver of skirt, and who are open-minded. Perhaps that rules you out?"

-- MWT  ;)


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #139 on: October 23, 2019, 07:34:21 PM »
John,

Here's the whole post. You left the highlighted part out.

"I don't need to point out the two "bars" visible in the woman's skirt in the Darnell frame on page 20 to people who can see, who know where to find that sliver of skirt, and who are open-minded. Perhaps that rules you out?"

What I see is you continuing to avoid pointing out where these fantasy "bars" are.