Those Front Steps

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 348813 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #140 on: October 23, 2019, 11:35:39 PM »
Oh dear oh dear oh dear, Mr Storing. You swing between affirming Mr Frazier's identity in Wiegman-----------------so that you can argue he had 'time' to lunge forward and be the second 'Lovelady' head------------------to querying it.

You are defying common sense by once again reverting to the argument that Mr Frazier in Wiegman might not be Mr Frazier in Darnell:





It's blindingly obvious we're seeing the same tall dark-haired figure with the distinctive Elvis hair!

Who else do you think this tall dark-haired figure with the distinctive Elvis hair in Wiegman might possibly be? A name would be great!  Thumb1:

    Your powers of observation are Immediately called into question when You label Buell Frazier's locks to be "distinctive Elvis hair".  You continue shooting yourself in the foot.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #141 on: October 24, 2019, 12:06:37 AM »
    Your powers of observation are Immediately called into question when You label Buell Frazier's locks to be "distinctive Elvis hair".  You continue shooting yourself in the foot.

Like I say, Mr Storing, a name would be great!

Who else--------if not Mr Frazier----------do you believe this tall dark-haired individual could possibly be?


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #142 on: October 24, 2019, 04:52:56 PM »
Like I say, Mr Storing, a name would be great!

Who else--------if not Mr Frazier----------do you believe this tall dark-haired individual could possibly be?



    You DQ yourself by labeling Buell Frazier's hair as "Elvis hair". It is difficult to conduct a conversation regarding Image Observations when you come out with something like that.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #143 on: October 24, 2019, 09:43:52 PM »
    ID'ing someone by process of elimination is weak at best.

But I'm not IDing Mr Frazier by process of elimination, I'm IDing him by using my eyes:




I suggest you use yours and stop arguing for the sake of being argumentative. You haven't a leg to stand on here, sorry!

As for Mr Frazier's not talking up about Mr Oswald's location just in front of him? It's beyond naive to think great pressure wouldn't have been placed on him to shut up. Stop arguing like a Lone Nutter, Mr Storing, it doesn't become you!

Remember: Mr Oswald himself claimed to have been out front-------------



Refusing to contemplate that this bombshell fact may be related to the magic dark strip down Mr Lovelady's side is the height of silliness...

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #144 on: October 24, 2019, 10:23:10 PM »
But I'm not IDing Mr Frazier by process of elimination, I'm IDing him by using my eyes:




I suggest you use yours and stop arguing for the sake of being argumentative. You haven't a leg to stand on here, sorry!

As for Mr Frazier's not talking up about Mr Oswald's location just in front of him? It's beyond naive to think great pressure wouldn't have been placed on him to shut up. Stop arguing like a Lone Nutter, Mr Storing, it doesn't become you!

Remember: Mr Oswald himself claimed to have been out front-------------



Refusing to contemplate that this bombshell fact may be related to the magic dark strip down Mr Lovelady's side is the height of silliness...

    Claiming You can actually see Oswald inside that circle is  BS:. As to your claiming Frasier was under all kinds of pressure to LIE about not seeing Oswald on the TSBD steps, I remind You that Frazier is still alive. Who are You claiming Frazier is afraid of 55+ years After the fact? Your being forced to grasp at straws like this is indicative of the weakness of your theory.  With regard to the Hosty Notes documenting that Oswald was outside the TSBD, Oswald made all kinds of claims we Know to Not be true. For openers, start with the rifle which his wife ID'd that day + the pics.  I value the Hosty Notes as it Proves that there remains Unknown JFK Assassination Evidence. The Hosty Notes gives credibility to those that think it is possible that there still is Unknown assassination photo(s) and or film footage buried in grandma's attic.   

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #145 on: October 24, 2019, 10:49:06 PM »
With regard to the Hosty Notes documenting that Oswald was outside the TSBD, Oswald made all kinds of claims we Know to Not be true. For openers, start with the rifle which his wife ID'd that day + the pics.

His wife didn't ID any rifle that day.  Nor do the pics exclusively identify any specific rifle.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #146 on: October 24, 2019, 11:55:11 PM »
    Claiming You can actually see Oswald inside that circle is  BS:. As to your claiming Frasier was under all kinds of pressure to LIE about not seeing Oswald on the TSBD steps, I remind You that Frazier is still alive. Who are You claiming Frazier is afraid of 55+ years After the fact? Your being forced to grasp at straws like this is indicative of the weakness of your theory.  With regard to the Hosty Notes documenting that Oswald was outside the TSBD, Oswald made all kinds of claims we Know to Not be true. For openers, start with the rifle which his wife ID'd that day + the pics.  I value the Hosty Notes as it Proves that there remains Unknown JFK Assassination Evidence. The Hosty Notes gives credibility to those that think it is possible that there still is Unknown assassination photo(s) and or film footage buried in grandma's attic.

 :D

So you value the Hosty note,
------------not because it proves that Mr Oswald claimed to have been out front
------------not because it proves that Mr Oswald's interrogators lied about where he claimed to have been at the time of the assassination
------------but because... well... uh...just because it's something... uh... new!

This is like saying "I value the Zapruder Film because it shows Jean Hill looked fetching in red".

I'm afraid you're in The McAdams Zone here, Mr Storing, studiously missing the point as soon as it gets dangerous.

Thankfully, however, your arguments have flopped, each and every one.

You have failed to offer
----------an alternative logical explanation for the dark strip down Mr Lovelady's side
----------an alternative logical candidate for the person identified as Mr Frazier in Wiegman
----------an alternative logical candidate for the actual Mr Frazier in Wiegman
----------an alternative logical explanation for the frames showing a second 'Lovelady' head.

Yet, despite this litany of blanks fired, you blithely assure us there's nothing to see here.

This has been a most revealing exchange!