Those Front Steps

[John Mytton]

Quite revealing of your Soopah-Doopah-3D-Method, eh? You'll never live this down! Maybe you might accept bespoke GIF-requests from members? 'Hi John, big fan of your work. I'd like a GIF proving that JFK was sitting in front of Connally in the limousine please'. You know, that kind of thing?

How is an unfinished graphic that I took down before you even posted your first response revealing of anything besides your dishonesty? And I do hope you "never let me live it down" because my response will always show the character of someone who considers an immoral act as "fair game".

Getting back to the real subject of Lovelady's shadow, my irrefutable "Mytton 3D Wonder" proves perspective doesn't lie and Lovelady cannot exist to the right in Darnell, it's impossible. Lovelady was and always will be at that moment in the shadow and so far there's not a thing that you can do to refute it.





Btw we know you think my graphics are crap, so from your perspective they can't prove or disprove where Lovelady is standing and you are still left with the responsibility of proving that Lovelady is not in the shadow or have you forgotten?, but I bet your next post will be more of my graphics which ironically by your definition can't prove squat and therefore cannot prove your theory, which so far is "Alan sees something, but Alan can't prove it! Hilarious!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Because of the dramatic parallax shift and lack of detail in Altgens, at first this morph was a little confusing as seen in the last half dozen Alan Ford posts, but after a little effort it actually turned out pretty good. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!



Vs my original "unfinished" version which was deleted before anyone posted a reply which is apparently "fair game" in Alan Ford's world. Because Alan can't win with brains Alan fights with deceit, what a man.



JohnM

[Alan Ford]

Getting back to the real subject of Lovelady's shadow, my irrefutable "Mytton 3D Wonder" proves perspective doesn't lie and Lovelady cannot exist to the right in Darnell, it's impossible. Lovelady was and always will be at that moment in the shadow and so far there's not a thing that you can do to refute it.

 

Which side of the center railing is this lady standing?



If you're so sure of your Soopah-Doopah-3D-Darnell-Wiegman-GIF, Mr Mytton, you will happily answer the question!

[John Mytton]

Soopah-Doopah-3D-Darnell-Wiegman-GIF

 

I gave you links to "perspective 101" but you ignored my help and now we laugh at your failure.



Btw Alan, are you ever going to prove where Lovelady is actually standing because so far you haven't proven squat and what you think you see isn't an answer.

 

JohnM

[Alan Ford]

Because Alan can't win with brains Alan fights with deceit, what a man.

Talk about projection! 

Now, Mr Mytton, I'm so glad you have recovered sufficiently from your sheer and utter mortification (not to mention your impotent fury!) to feel in a position to present us with a 'finished graphic' of Altgens:



Happily, it is--------in its own way---------just as hilariously mad as your earlier effort.

For you really do seem to be laboring under the delusion that a Mr Lovelady standing several feet back on the landing would have been visible to Mr Altgens. Well I've got news for you: he wouldn't!

This is what happens if Mr Lovelady is put leaning forward at the edge of the landing:



Were Mr Hackerott to move Mr Lovelady back to where you're saying he is---------------------i.e. deep on the landing--------------------why he would disappear from Altgens' sight!

Oops! 

[Alan Ford]

I gave you links to "perspective 101" but you ignored my help and now we laugh at your failure.



Btw Alan, are you ever going to prove where Lovelady is actually standing because so far you haven't proven squat and what you think you see isn't an answer.

 

JohnM

Stop crying, Mr Mytton, and just answer the question:

Which side of the center railing is this lady standing?



 

[John Mytton]

Talk about projection! 

Now, Mr Mytton, I'm so glad you have recovered sufficiently from your sheer and utter mortification (not to mention your impotent fury!) to feel in a position to present us with a 'finished graphic' of Altgens:



Happily, it is--------in its own way---------just as hilariously mad as your earlier effort.

For you really do seem to be laboring under the delusion that a Mr Lovelady standing several feet back on the landing would have been visible to Mr Altgens. Well I've got news for you: he wouldn't!

This is what happens if Mr Lovelady is put leaning forward at the edge of the landing:



Were Mr Hackerott to move Mr Lovelady back to where you're saying he is---------------------i.e. deep on the landing--------------------why he would disappear from Altgens' sight!

Oops! 

My "sheer and utter mortification" and "impotent fury" Are you serious you can't beat my graphics and now you come back with juvenile unrelated ad-homs, you really aren't very good at this.
And your CGI cartoon of Altgens 6 is equally not very helpful and since Altgens 6 wasn't simultaneous with either Wiegamn or Darnell it's a waste of my time.
Try again and prove that Lovelady hasn't moved between Altgens 6 and Weigman?
As I said at the start, insulting my "crap graphics" isn't getting you any closer to proving Lovelady had a shadow painted over him, where's your proof, the whole community is waiting with baited breath.

JohnM