Those Front Steps

[Alan Ford]

Friends, in case you're wondering what poor Mr Mytton was up to when he put together this hilarious gif------------



-------------he was trying to find a way of reconciling

a) his barmy claim that Mr Lovelady in Wiegman is deep on the landing (studying the texture of the west wall, one presumes, even as he applies luminescent paint to his face to counteract the horizontal shadow and readies himself to bend down and tie his shoelaces)

with

b) the inconvenient evidence offered by the Altgens photograph.

The scam was to sell us the soopah-doopah-barmy idea that Mr Lovelady is deep on the landing in Altgens too. All a matter of-------------you guessed it---------------'perspective'... 

Hands up who thinks Mr Mytton should have left well alone!

[John Mytton]

Please, Mr Mytton, don't beat yourself up too much over your 'unfinished graphic'--------

I told you repeatedly it was an unfinished graphic which I clearly edited before you even made your first post but now you keep reposting this unfinished graphic and trying to deceive members about the quality of my work, this is a clear rule violation and will not be tolerated. Either argue my published works on their own merit or face the consequences. Next time I won't be so courteous.

Quotes, images and /or articles from members of this forum, or from outside sources, must not be altered in a manner that is designed to deceive, and must reference the name of the who is person being quoted. Changing a persons quoted blue box words in ANY way is not allowed.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2006.0.html

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Friends, in case you're wondering what poor Mr Mytton was up to when he put together this hilarious gif------------

I told you repeatedly it was an unfinished graphic which I clearly edited before you even made your first post but now you keep reposting this unfinished graphic and trying to deceive members about the quality of my work, this is a clear rule violation and will not be tolerated. Either argue my published works on their own merit or face the consequences. Next time I won't be so courteous.

Quotes, images and /or articles from members of this forum, or from outside sources, must not be altered in a manner that is designed to deceive, and must reference the name of the who is person being quoted. Changing a persons quoted blue box words in ANY way is not allowed.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2006.0.html

JohnM

[Alan Ford]

I told you repeatedly it was an unfinished graphic which I clearly edited before you even made your first post but now you keep reposting this unfinished graphic and trying to deceive members about the quality of my work, this is a clear rule violation and will not be tolerated. Either argue my published works on their own merit or face the consequences. Next time I won't be so courteous.

Quotes, images and /or articles from members of this forum, or from outside sources, must not be altered in a manner that is designed to deceive, and must reference the name of the who is person being quoted. Changing a persons quoted blue box words in ANY way is not allowed.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2006.0.html

JohnM

 

But I haven't altered what you posted one jot, Mr Mytton. Here it is, just as you posted it:



And I've made sure to state clearly that it is your work! 

The fact that you're embarrassed by the insight this gif gives into your Soopah-Doopah-3D-Method is neither my problem nor a contravention of the rules of this forum! 

[John Mytton]

But I haven't altered what you posted one jot, Mr Mytton. Here it is, just as you posted it:

From a post that was edited before you even made your first reply and on top of that you stole my unfinished image and uploaded it to your own library and now you keep reposting the unfinished image as way to deceive members about my work. The wording is not exact but the very spirit of this rule is being violated.

Quotes, images and /or articles from members of this forum, or from outside sources, must not be altered in a manner that is designed to deceive, and must reference the name of the who is person being quoted. Changing a persons quoted blue box words in ANY way is not allowed.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2006.0.html

If you think that it's ethical to be so dishonest then I'm afraid that doesn't say very nice things about your upbringing.

Anyway the facts speak for themselves, there is no way you can get Lovelady to the right in Darnell, the perspective from those angles are locked in.





Btw Alan beside you saying it doesn't look right what proof if any have you bought to this discussion?

JohnM

[Alan Ford]

From a post that was edited before you even made your first reply and on top of that you stole my unfinished image and uploaded it to your own library and now you keep reposting the unfinished image as way to deceive members about my work. The wording is not exact but the very spirit of this rule is being violated.

Quotes, images and /or articles from members of this forum, or from outside sources, must not be altered in a manner that is designed to deceive, and must reference the name of the who is person being quoted. Changing a persons quoted blue box words in ANY way is not allowed.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2006.0.html

If you think that it's ethical to be so dishonest then I'm afraid that doesn't say very nice things about your upbringing.

Anyway the facts speak for themselves, there is no way you can get Lovelady to the right in Darnell, the perspective from those angles are locked in.





Btw Alan beside you saying it doesn't look right what proof if any have you bought to this discussion?

JohnM

 

Sorry, Mr Mytton, if you post something on this forum then it's fair game. As for your giving lectures on ethics and honesty, well I've heard it all!

Here's what you posted:



Quite revealing of your Soopah-Doopah-3D-Method, eh? You'll never live this down! Maybe you might accept bespoke GIF-requests from members? 'Hi John, big fan of your work. I'd like a GIF proving that JFK was sitting in front of Connally in the limousine please'. You know, that kind of thing?

Now!

How many times are you going to evade my simple question?

Which side of the center railing is this lady standing?



 

[John Mytton]

Sorry, Mr Mytton, if you post something on this forum then it's fair game. As for your giving lectures on ethics and honesty, well I've heard it all!

Here's what you posted:

Fair game?, so you think posting an unfinished graphic from a post that was edited before you even replied is fair game, thanks for admitting that all you have left is to present a dishonest argument.
So far your proof of Lovelady's position is "I can see it, now you prove I'm wrong", well Alan the 3D doesn't lie, as long as the corresponding points are married up it's mathematically perfect, and there is no way you are getting Lovelady near that railing and resorting to these every devious technique to refute my work isn't helping your credibility.



When Lovelady is placed on the opposite side all hell breaks loose.

https://i.postimg.cc/9FHc4w5Q/love-entrance-shadowb.gif

Now post my "unfinished graphic" as a response because that's all you got and I'm actually enjoying watching you squirm.
Then fill us in how about how they painted a shadow onto Lovelady but forgot to paint out Oswald's head, Doh!
Or how they did or the forgery within a day?
Or why they just didn't snip out the half a second with Lovelady and Oswald?

JohnM