The "Domino Room Alibi"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "Domino Room Alibi"  (Read 187032 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #427 on: September 27, 2019, 04:33:52 AM »
Maybe we just should call you the loser.....

How about "Underdog"?

And you?

You could be "Weasel"!

--  MWT   Walk:
« Last Edit: September 27, 2019, 11:13:56 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #428 on: September 27, 2019, 06:15:47 AM »
Now that we can agree the balance of evidence puts the arrival of Jarman and Norman on the 5th floor after Rowland's gunman sighting at 12.15pm let's explore an event that, in my view, never happened. Given's cigarette trip in which he claimed to have seen Oswald on the 6th floor after the "elevator race".

I would start with this.....as an entre....

Mr. BELIN. Did you wear a jacket to work that day?
Mr. GIVENS. I wore a raincoat, I believe. It was misting that morning.
Mr. BELIN. Did you hang up your coat in that room, too?
Mr. GIVENS. Yes, sir.

Mr. BELIN. When did you see Lee Harvey Oswald next?
Mr. GIVENS. Next?
Mr. BELIN. Yes.
Mr. GIVENS. Well, it was about a quarter till 12, we were on our way downstairs, and we passed him, and he was standing at the gate on the fifth floor.
I came downstairs, and I discovered I left my cigarettes in my jacket pocket upstairs, and I took the elevator back upstairs to get my jacket with my cigarettes in it. When I got back upstairs, he was on the sixth floor in that vicinity, coming from that way.

For the true believers to counter with "something".
« Last Edit: September 27, 2019, 06:16:33 AM by Colin Crow »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #429 on: September 27, 2019, 07:16:55 AM »
As I recall Sylvia Meagher had Givens covered decades ago but you may be headed somewhere else...

Hello Otto,
I think it's time that both sides accepted that "Given's story" should be rejected as a total fabrication. It should be removed from the sequence of events unless some supporting evidence can be produced.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5118
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #430 on: September 27, 2019, 08:38:02 AM »
As I recall Sylvia Meagher had Givens covered decades ago but you may be headed somewhere else...

Sylvia Meagher -- LOL

JohnM

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #431 on: September 27, 2019, 08:53:58 AM »
When have you ever considered anything coming from the WC as being 'good enough'?

Back to, I know you are but what am I -type responses.
Less than creative, Bill.
You don't have much to offer.
In fact, you are the one supporting a claim.
It looks like you have no reason to be supporting the claim or at least you are reluctant to do so.
Why support what you can't seem to back up or is it all of sudden a secret?

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #432 on: September 27, 2019, 11:00:52 AM »
Sylvia Meagher -- LOL

JohnM

Other than her and her colleagues’ insatiable passion for pointing out normal (not to them) inconsistencies in the recollections of witnesses, nowhere does Meagher tell her readers what the relevance of these inconsistencies was. Was it her point that Williams was lying, that the chicken eater was the assassin in the sniper’s nest (who wasn’t, Meagher would assure us, Oswald), or Williams was not lying, but the assassin in the sniper’s nest was also eating chicken while he waited to kill the president?

I wish the theorists would tell us the relevance of the many inconsistencies they cite in the Kennedy case instead of feeling that the inconsistencies are an end in themselves and nothing else has to be shown or argued." --

Vincent Bugliosi; Page 23 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History"-LMAO

Most of the inconsistencies are remarkably consistent

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #433 on: September 27, 2019, 11:08:14 AM »
Other than her and her colleagues’ insatiable passion for pointing out normal (not to them) inconsistencies in the recollections of witnesses, nowhere does Meagher tell her readers what the relevance of these inconsistencies was. Was it her point that Williams was lying, that the chicken eater was the assassin in the sniper’s nest (who wasn’t, Meagher would assure us, Oswald), or Williams was not lying, but the assassin in the sniper’s nest was also eating chicken while he waited to kill the president?

I wish the theorists would tell us the relevance of the many inconsistencies they cite in the Kennedy case instead of feeling that the inconsistencies are an end in themselves and nothing else has to be shown or argued." --

Vincent Bugliosi; Page 23 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History"-LMAO

Most of the inconsistencies are remarkably consistent

Colin,

Speaking of fried chicken, I noticed what looked like greasy spots on the long bag that was discovered in the Sniper's Nest.

In the photo showing the homicide officers(?) displaying the long bag and the Dr. Pepper bottle outside the TSBD.

But then again, maybe it was just the greasy cheese sammich.

--  MWT  ;)

PS  "Remarkably consistent" in what way, Colin?

Do they all point to the evil, evil, evil CIA's and the Deep State's doing the deed?

Thanks in advance.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2019, 11:40:30 AM by Thomas Graves »