Is that as 'flawed' as you lot never posting the butt-end view of CE399?
My “lot” has posted that photo here many times. This is just one of the BS claims you trot out repeatedly.
Is that as 'flawed' as starting Zap a few frames late (as per Martin Hinrichs) in arguments re the twofer?
What “twofer”? When did Martin say anything about starting Zap a few frames late?
Is that as 'flawed' as you attempting to try the case in bits & pieces (while at the same time holding each separate piece to a beyond-reasonable-doubt standard) like some Better Call Saul-style greaseball?
I don’t know why
you lot think that pieces evidence that don’t meet a reasonable doubt standard somehow combine to meet one. Garbage in, garbage out.