Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 99625 times)

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1772
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #416 on: August 04, 2019, 10:38:35 PM »
Advertisement
Holland says there were 40 to 50 people searching behind the fence within 15 minutes.

Straw man.


Within 3 to 5 minutes after the shots the area behind the fence was sealed off by about 50 policemen.  - Lee Bowers

Straw man.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #416 on: August 04, 2019, 10:38:35 PM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #417 on: August 05, 2019, 01:58:17 AM »
What are you talking about?

Look, this is real simple.

There was no immediate rush to the knoll.  The images posted by John Mytton show that.  What don't you understand?
His shows what the other photo shows. Let me guess how many times you've been wrong... all of them.  You've never been right.  Nice batting average

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #418 on: August 05, 2019, 03:43:12 AM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #419 on: August 06, 2019, 06:55:58 AM »
quote author=Bill Brown link=topic=2031.msg57833#msg57833 date=1564896354]
What are you talking about?

Look, this is real simple.

There was no immediate rush to the knoll.  The images posted by John Mytton show that.  What don't you understand?


Straw man

"Holland says there were 40 to 50 people searching behind the fence within 15 minutes."

Straw man.

"Within 3 to 5 minutes after the shots the area behind the fence was sealed off by about 50 policemen."  - Lee Bowers


Not a straw man.

How did that many people end up in the railroad yard so quickly after the shots if there wasn't a rush up the Knoll?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #420 on: August 07, 2019, 06:46:27 PM »
An interesting interview here with Fisher......starts @42.40


Interesting indeed.  What kind of investigator gets angry when he doesn't get the answers he wants?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #420 on: August 07, 2019, 06:46:27 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #421 on: August 07, 2019, 06:51:29 PM »
"Frazier said to Tom Meros"  LOL

"I saw him go in the back door at the Loading Dock of the building that we work in, and he still had the package under his arm." -- Buell Wesley Frazier (affidavit, 11/22/63)

Frazier said to Mary Rattan LOL.

But note that he didn't say he saw the package under Oswald's arm at that time.  He merely assumed it, because it was under Oswald's arm when he walked away from the car.  Of course, none of this has anything to do with Oswald entering the TSBD building itself.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #422 on: August 07, 2019, 06:52:47 PM »
No.

Every employee who had cause to handle the boxes found in the sniper's nest was indeed fingerprinted.

Awesome.  What make you think the murderer had to be someone "who had cause to handle the boxes"?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #422 on: August 07, 2019, 06:52:47 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #423 on: August 08, 2019, 04:26:38 PM »
Frazier said to Mary Rattan LOL.

But note that he didn't say he saw the package under Oswald's arm at that time.  He merely assumed it, because it was under Oswald's arm when he walked away from the car.  Of course, none of this has anything to do with Oswald entering the TSBD building itself.

Iacoletti,

Do you think it's reasonable to demand that Frazier, in order to be credible regarding his witnessing Oswald's carrying the package into the TSBD, state, "... and I could see with my very own 20/20 eyeballs that Oswald had NOT jettisoned or hidden the package of curtain rods somewhere in front of me in the parking lot, but was STILL carrying it when he entered the TSBD"?

-- MWT  ;)

PS  Not unlike your implicit demand that Jacob, Holt and Simmons state unequivocally that they had walked to and watched the motorcade "shoulder-to-shoulder," i.e., that while they were walking there, their respective shoulders were, on average, two feet from each other's right or left shoulder, and while they were standing and watching the motorcade "on (the north side of) Elm Street about half-way between Houston Street and the Triple Underpass," their shoulders were, ON AVERAGE, only 1.5 feet apart.

The same regarding Calvary, Hicks, Reed, and Westbrook, yes?

Otherwise, it's reasonable to assume that they weren't physically close enough to each other during the motorcade, and that would "explain" why they weren't photographically captured "all together" in any of the photos and films, right?

LOL
« Last Edit: August 08, 2019, 05:12:27 PM by Thomas Graves »