>>> You're awfully needy for a guy who claims nothing points to Oswald as killer
When did I claim that? You?re still batting .000.
>>> You continue to weaponize the word 'believe' from your TAE foxhole.
No idea what you?re talking about. How is it a ?weapon??
>>> I know what I call you characters. You just don't appear to know what 'you lot' means.
I know why you use the expression. It?s so you can claim someone said something that he never actually said. Like this for example:
"What will it take for you
To start opening your eyes"
--- Shelley Segal
I?m not Shelley Segal, nor do I help her write her songs. So you can?t cite
me ever saying that, then?
>>> I personally do not take anything at face value.
You mean other than the Warren Commission?
Do you take anomaly-hunting and seeing every last bit of minutae as sinister and loaded with malicious intent as a virtue?
Why would you ask? Can you cite me ever saying that every last bit of minutae is sinister and loaded with malicious intent?
You can?t ignore anomalies and then claim to ?not take anything at face value?.
>>> Your continued need to diminish my take on the events (and in the way I often express that take) is duly noted.
