A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 336676 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #287 on: March 16, 2018, 06:26:42 PM »
Actually Tim, Darby did analyze a left little fingerprint of Wallace's. The problem was, it was a plant. Author Barr McClellan along with another author named Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint card and what they claimed was a latent print and have him analyze them. Of course he said it was a match. When he was told that the only latent print found was a palm print Darby knew he had been played. It was all just so McClellan and Harrison could write a book. That's what all this has turned in to. It is just so the CT buff authors can sell books. That is why people like Harold Weisberg fight so hard against authors like Bugliosi and Posner. It kills their book sells if too many people start believing Oswald acted alone. It is disgusting that they make so much money off of lies and the president's death.

It's not clear to me what you are saying. I assumed that Darby was given fingerprints of Wallace's in order to compare with the unidentified print from the sixth floor. I don't know what you mean by "it was a plant" though. Perhaps you mis worded it. A fraud by Livingston and McClellan may be what you meant to say.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #288 on: March 16, 2018, 06:28:51 PM »
Isn't it funny how LNers are all about the planted evidence when it suits them.

This one isn't about planted evidence. It's about a fraud carried out by Livingston and McClellan.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #289 on: March 16, 2018, 06:31:49 PM »
Author Barr McClellan along with another author named Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint card and what they claimed was a latent print and have him analyze them.

You mean the way Latona was given an index card with what they claimed was a latent partial palmprint lifted from the rifle barrel?  You mean the way Scalice was given photographs of what they claimed was the trigger guard area of the rifle?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #290 on: March 16, 2018, 06:35:01 PM »
You mean the way Latona was given an index card with what they claimed was a latent partial palmprint lifted from the rifle

How is that anywhere near the same? The card did hold a latent print that was lifted from the rifle.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: A straight line
« Reply #291 on: March 16, 2018, 07:30:03 PM »
How is that anywhere near the same? The card did hold a latent print that was lifted from the rifle.

That's easy for you to say.

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
    • SPMLaw
Re: A straight line
« Reply #292 on: March 16, 2018, 10:35:51 PM »
If Spock's head was turned, how would he know who dropped the hammer?
Maybe he would use logic to conclude that it was the guy who immediately picked up the hammer, threw it into the closet, ran out the door and down to the officers' mess and grabbed a Dr. Klingon (a popular soft drink) to look cool and avoid suspicion, then ran toward the escape deck killing a Vulcan security guard on the way, then ran into the virtual reality theater (without paying) and finally tried to shoot the security guards when placed under arrest.

Offline Alice Thorton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: A straight line
« Reply #293 on: March 16, 2018, 11:28:23 PM »
If any of you could link some websites that talk about Johnson and his associate's involvement in the assassination I would appreciate it.