A straight line

[John Mytton]

Rubbish. Wallace's fingerprint is not a myth as much as you LNers would like to believe. Joan Mellen was taking the word of a member of the FBI, who originally pooh-poohed the print, based on what??? Where is their analysis/report? You can't just say nope the print doesn't match. Obviously, the FBI is still working the BS to this day. Why would Walt Brown lie? Was he not as competent as whomever analyzed the print at the FBI? Isn't that like the GOP overseeing the Trump investigation? Give me a break!

The fingerprints exist so instead of your endless bleating get up off your lazy ass, take the fingerprints to someone with authority and prove something for a change.



JohnM

[Tim Nickerson]

Rubbish. Wallace's fingerprint is not a myth as much as you LNers would like to believe. Joan Mellen was taking the word of a member of the FBI, who originally pooh-poohed the print, based on what??? Where is their analysis/report? You can't just say nope the print doesn't match. Obviously, the FBI is still working the BS to this day. Why would Walt Brown lie? Was he not as competent as whomever analyzed the print at the FBI? Isn't that like the GOP overseeing the Trump investigation? Give me a break!

Uhhh...do you know who Walt Brown is?

[Jack Trojan]

Uhhh...do you know who Walt Brown is?

He's the researcher who got A. Nathan Darby to analyze the fingerprint and declared it a match to Wallace. Didn't he?

[Jack Trojan]

The fingerprints exist so instead of your endless bleating get up off your lazy ass, take the fingerprints to someone with authority and prove something for a change.



JohnM

  Did you get off your lazy ass and do my laser experiment yet? I'll bet you did and you're choked over the results!

[Tim Nickerson]

He's the researcher who got A. Nathan Darby to analyze the fingerprint and declared it a match to Wallace. Didn't he?

Ok. The way that you worded it sounded like you were say that Walt Brown was the expert in fingerprint identification.

Darby never analyzed a fingerprint and matched it to Wallace. He analyzed a photograph of a palm print and declared it a match to Wallace's fingerprint.

[Tim Nickerson]

Did you get off your lazy ass and do my laser experiment yet? I'll bet you did and you're choked over the results!

Get off your own lazy ass and show us the pictures and data of your laser experiment.

[Wesley Johnson]

Ok. The way that you worded it sounded like you were say that Walt Brown was the expert in fingerprint identification.

Darby never analyzed a fingerprint and matched it to Wallace. He analyzed a photograph of a palm print and declared it a match to Wallace's fingerprint.

Actually Tim, Darby did analyze a left little fingerprint of Wallace's. The problem was, it was a plant. Author Barr McClellan along with another author named Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint card and what they claimed was a latent print and have him analyze them. Of course he said it was a match. When he was told that the only latent print found was a palm print Darby knew he had been played. It was all just so McClellan and Harrison could write a book. That's what all this has turned in to. It is just so the CT buff authors can sell books. That is why people like Harold Weisberg fight so hard against authors like Bugliosi and Posner. It kills their book sells if too many people start believing Oswald acted alone. It is disgusting that they make so much money off of lies and the president's death.