A straight line

[Jack Trojan]

Actually Tim, Darby did analyze a left little fingerprint of Wallace's. The problem was, it was a plant. Author Barr McClellan along with another author named Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint card and what they claimed was a latent print and have him analyze them. Of course he said it was a match. When he was told that the only latent print found was a palm print Darby knew he had been played. It was all just so McClellan and Harrison could write a book. That's what all this has turned in to. It is just so the CT buff authors can sell books. That is why people like Harold Weisberg fight so hard against authors like Bugliosi and Posner. It kills their book sells if too many people start believing Oswald acted alone. It is disgusting that they make so much money off of lies and the president's death.

Wallace's fingerprint was a plant? You're sounding a little like a CT (Coincidence Theorist). Are you saying that Walt Brown planted the Wallace print to indemnify Oswald?

[Tim Nickerson]

Tim, McClellan and Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint of Wallace's along with an old fingerprint card with Wallace's print on it.

Wesley, Are sure about that? From a signed 1998 affidavit by Nathan Darby:

7.    Recently I received a photocopy of an inked print along with a
photocopy of a latent print from [ Texas researcher]. After careful
and extended examination of the inked print photocopy and the latent
print photocopy given to me, I have their identifying characteristics
marked and numbered. The inked print is Exhibit DAN #3, and the latent
Print is Exhibit DAN #4.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.crime/k8Ji79QRyXk

[Jack Trojan]

"Agents" took Oswald's palm print post-mortem to compare against the print on the MC? When did they claim that?

[Alice Thorton]

LBJ was befriended by literally everyone, and if he wasn't he threatened to blackmail them, so no it doesn't surprise me that all evidence is "disappeared"

[Andrew Mason]

LBJ was befriended by literally everyone, and if he wasn't he threatened to blackmail them, so no it doesn't surprise me that all evidence is "disappeared"

Ok, I get it.  So you are saying that the fact that there is no evidence that LBJ was involved is, therefore, evidence he was involved. 

[Joe Elliott]

LBJ was befriended by literally everyone, and if he wasn't he threatened to blackmail them, so no it doesn't surprise me that all evidence is "disappeared"

https://www.skeptic.com/downloads/conspiracy-theories-who-why-and-how.pdf

Section 7   -   ?Top Ten Ways to Test Conspiacies?

2. The agents behind the pattern of conspiracy would need nearly superhuman power to pull it off. Most of the time in most circumstances, people are not nearly so powerful as we think they are.



During his years in Congress, while I thought he was pretty busy with legislation, LBJ was buddying up with FBI agents, Naval Doctors, even each member of the Dallas Police Force. After all, you never know which of them may stumble upon evidence that needs to be suppressed. Those he couldn?t charm, he managed to dig up stuff he could blackmail them with (like periodically breaking their patrol to used a restroom). LBJ was totally amazing.

[Jack Trojan]

LBJ was amazing all right. He once tied a stick of dynamite to the leg of a dog and blew it up. I can see how that could have gone horribly wrong. "No boy, no...run away, GO AWAY, NOOOOO...BOOM!