A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 337106 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A straight line
« Reply #133 on: February 23, 2018, 10:33:17 PM »
I have never claimed to be an expert, I let my posts and images do the talking.
Your posts aren't talkin' to anyone.

Quote
I can't respond to this, you're a certified Loony!
:( LOL!

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: A straight line
« Reply #134 on: February 23, 2018, 10:41:41 PM »

Awesome, our self professed photogrammetrist nuclear scientist is back. Yippee!

 ;D

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #135 on: February 23, 2018, 10:56:23 PM »

Mytton, you're such a dufus, and a total amateur, mate. You need to take some courses on forensic photogrammetry for you to recognize how clueless and full of BS you are.

All this CAD crap is pointless and misleading. There are 2 angles you need to know to do a formal trajectory analysis, which are the angles from the 6th floor to the limo in 3-space. I accept that the downward angle is 17 degrees and the tangential angle is 7 degrees. But that's where it ends with respect to 3D modelling. I have to laugh at all the CAD renderings to analyze a problem that can be accomplished with human surrogates, not CGI models. Photoshoppers, which includes Myttonhead need to bow out and stop posting crap that they know nothing about. The most frustrating part of posting on the JFK forum is that ALL analyses are null and void because the LNers are not peers wrt photo-analysis. They're photoshoppers, not photogrammetrists.

I have said it over and over how any Joe LNer can settle the premise of this thread by setting up 2 lasers that point at one another (17 deg downward, 7 degrees tangential) and experiment with actors in a simulated limo. Surrogates don't lie, CGI does. Do the damned experiment for yourself. It's cheap and accurate as hell. But somehow I doubt any LNer will post the results.

Lastly, here's more food for thought. If 1 of the head shots did come from the front, then where was the shooter?



Are we to take your word for the laser thing, or are you going to post your experiment? Surely you would have a video of what you claim...

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: A straight line
« Reply #136 on: February 23, 2018, 11:26:42 PM »
Are we to take your word for the laser thing, or are you going to post your experiment? Surely you would have a video of what you claim...





Quote
Are we to take your word for the laser thing

Of course Bill, why would a Photogrammetrist, Nuclear scientist and all round Whizz Kid Lie???



JohnM

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #137 on: February 24, 2018, 04:27:49 AM »

Of course Bill, why would a Photogrammetrist, Nuclear scientist and all round Whizz Kid Lie???

JohnM

Does Trojan claim to be a professional?

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: A straight line
« Reply #138 on: February 24, 2018, 04:42:11 AM »
Does Trojan claim to be a professional?





Does Trojan claim to be a professional?




Yep, he claims a new profession whenever it suits the argument, he shares a lot in common with that other new angry guy Lloyd Morris whose mouth also writes cheques that his ass can't cash and coincidentally these aggressive and angry guys are both obsessed with Allen Dulles. How about that!



JohnM
« Last Edit: February 24, 2018, 04:49:25 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: A straight line
« Reply #139 on: February 24, 2018, 05:07:41 AM »
Use ce1312
Seat him on the brick wall inside. Plenty of room for Oswald to be seen seated in the window and be seen before the motorcade arrived.

Take a knee and move to the edge of the window for the head shot: Brennan didn't know the windows were low to the floor, so the shooter  'appeared' to be standing.