A straight line

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 337134 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A straight line
« Reply #126 on: February 23, 2018, 09:30:10 PM »
Awesome, our self professed photogrammetrist nuclear scientist is back. Yippee!
I'm your worst nightmare Myttonhead, someone who knows what an amateur you are.

Quote
The image was simply showing the jacket bunch, the "CAD crap" comes from your Kooky mate Ernie! Hahaha!
So if JFK's jacket was "bunched" then he already had his hands to his throat before Z226, which caused the bunching, correct?
BTW, Earnie's CAD drawings are the best of the bunch and I am not claiming that 3D CGI is worthless, only that it will not convince anyone because you can arrange CGI characters any way you damn please. Human surrogates are the forensic way to settle this, which even YOU can do.

Quote
Bullets don't travel in straight lines. Try again
Bullets are like any object subjected to gravitational forces. They will take a parabolic path from start to finish. However, bullets travel so fast that their parabolic arc is very large and almost insignificant over a couple of hundred yards, mate.

Quote
Then you come up with this piece dog poo of an undefined 2D line on a 3D image done in Microsoft Paint -snigger-, some photogrammetrist!?, you're a Joke Trojan. LOLOLOLOL!

:D How you compose an image has nothing to do with the image editor you use, dufus. You have no idea.

Quote
Wow, Weidmann your blood brother did the exact same experiment, but forgot to document it! Doh!
How old are you? Do the SIMPLE, CHEAP experiment for yourself, or STFU.

JackT

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: A straight line
« Reply #127 on: February 23, 2018, 09:51:32 PM »
I'm your worst nightmare Myttonhead, someone who knows what an amateur you are.
So if JFK's jacket was "bunched" then he already had his hands to his throat before Z226, which caused the bunching, correct?
BTW, Earnie's CAD drawings are the best of the bunch and I am not claiming that 3D CGI is worthless, only that it will not convince anyone because you can arrange CGI characters any way you damn please. Human surrogates are the forensic way to settle this, which even YOU can do.
Bullets are like any object subjected to gravitational forces. They will take a parabolic path from start to finish. However, bullets travel so fast that their parabolic arc is very large and almost insignificant over a couple of hundred yards, mate.
:D How you compose an image has nothing to do with the image editor you use, dufus. You have no idea.
How old are you? Do the SIMPLE, CHEAP experiment for yourself, or STFU.

JackT




Quote
I'm your worst nightmare Myttonhead, someone who knows what an amateur you are.

Oh puhleeze, let's not go through your history where I have thoroughly smashed everyone of your layman claims, like when you claimed to know photography but didn't know basic 101 about actual 35mm film size or even it's orientation. How embarrassing!
 
Quote
So if JFK's jacket was "bunched" then he already had his hands to his throat before Z226, which caused the bunching, correct?

Huh?, the jacket was bunched from Love field right through to Elm Street and when any Jacket hole measurements are taken this bunching must be taken into account.

Quote
BTW, Earnie's CAD drawings are the best of the bunch and I am not claiming that 3D CGI is worthless, only that it will not convince anyone because you can arrange CGI characters any way you damn please.


Yep, Ernie's a classic at arranging CGI characters onto 2 dimensional backgrounds.

Quote
Human surrogates are the forensic way to settle this, which even YOU can do.

So can YOU, document and prove something for a change instead of bludging off everybody else.

Quote
How old are you? Do the SIMPLE, CHEAP experiment for yourself, or STFU.

Calm down and take some deep breaths before you pop a blood vessel.
If it's so simple show us stop making silly demands, YOU prove it, surely a photography expert has a camera, do you have a camera? Giggle!



JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8187
Re: A straight line
« Reply #128 on: February 23, 2018, 09:52:30 PM »



Awesome, our self professed photogrammetrist nuclear scientist is back. Yippee!

The image was simply showing the jacket bunch, the "CAD crap" comes from your Kooky mate Ernie! Hahaha!

Bullets don't travel in straight lines. Try again

Then you come up with this piece dog poo of an undefined 2D line on a 3D image done in Microsoft Paint -snigger-, some photogrammetrist!?, you're a Joke Trojan. LOLOLOLOL!



Wow, Weidmann your blood brother did the exact same experiment, but forgot to document it! Doh!



JohnM

Wow, Weidmann your blood brother did the exact same experiment, but forgot to document it! Doh!

You really have to misrepresent everything, don't you? What is it with you? Is it simply that you just can't help yourself or are you really so afraid of the truth that you feel you need to lie all the time?

First of all, I did not do the exact same experiment. I just pointed a laser from the location of the limo to the 6th floor window and I did so to satisfy my own curiosity. And secondly, I did not forget to document it, either. I never planned to do so and never gave it any thought. Obviously, at the time I did it, I was not aware that years later I would run into a complete idiotic liar like you.

In any event, the "experiment" made it painfully obvious that the entire SBT is complete fiction.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2018, 10:02:32 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: A straight line
« Reply #129 on: February 23, 2018, 09:55:07 PM »
Wow, Weidmann your blood brother did the exact same experiment, but forgot to document it! Doh!

You really have to misrepresent everything, don't you? What is it with you? Is it simply that you just can't help yourself or are you really so afraid of the truth that you feel you need to lie all the time?

First of all, I did not do the exact same experiment. I just pointed a laser from the location of the limo to the 6th floor window and I did so to satisfy my own curiosity. And secondly, I did not forget to document it, either. I never planned to do so and never gave it any thought. Obviously, at the time I did it, I was not aware that years later I found run into a complete idiotic liar like you.

In any event, the "experiment" made it painfully obvious that the entire SBT is complete fiction.




Blah blah blah, don't give us another sob story, either prove it or like your bosom buddy Trojan likes to say, STFU! ;D



JohnM
« Last Edit: February 23, 2018, 10:25:42 PM by John Mytton »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8187
Re: A straight line
« Reply #130 on: February 23, 2018, 09:57:57 PM »

Blah blah blah, don't give us another sob story, either prove it or like your bosom buddy Trojan says, STFU! ;D

JohnM

Trojan asked you how old you are and you have just provided the answer....

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A straight line
« Reply #131 on: February 23, 2018, 10:06:34 PM »
Oh puhleeze, let's not go through your history where I have thoroughly smashed everyone of your layman claims, like when you claimed to know photography but didn't know basic 101 about actual 35mm film size or even it's orientation. How embarrassing!
WTF are you talking about? You are the layman by everyone's standards.

Quote

Huh?, the jacket was bunched from Love field right through to Elm Street and when any Jacket hole measurements are taken this bunching must be taken into account.
JFK bunched the hell out of his jacket AFTER he got shot in the throat by the MB, which missed Connally. So what is your point dufus?

Quote
So can YOU, document and prove something for a change instead of bludging off everybody else.
Let's get this straight, no one is going to prove anything on the JFK forum, especially YOU.

Quote
Calm down and take some deep breaths before you pop a blood vessel.
If it's so simple show us stop making silly demands, YOU prove it, surely a photography expert has a camera, do you have a camera? Giggle!
I have done my laser experiment, which proves to me that the MB is BS. Would you buy my results if I posted them? Convince yourself dufus.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2018, 10:25:33 PM by Jack Trojan »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: A straight line
« Reply #132 on: February 23, 2018, 10:16:30 PM »
WTF are you talking about? You are the layman by everyone's standards.
JFK bunched the HELL out of his jacket after he got shot in the throat by the MB, which missed Connally. So what is your point dufus?
Let's get this straight, no one is going to prove anything on the JFK forum, especially YOU.
I have done my laser experiment, which proves to me that the MB is BS. What if I posted my results? Would you buy it? LOLOLOLOLOL! Convince yourself dufus.



Quote
WTF are you talking about? You are the layman by everyone's standards.

I have never claimed to be an expert, I let my posts and images do the talking.

Quote
JFK bunched the HELL out of his jacket after he got shot in the throat by the MB, which missed Connally. So what is your point dufus?
Let's get this straight, no one is going to prove anything on the JFK forum, especially YOU.
I have done my laser experiment, which proves to me that the MB is BS. What if I posted my results? Would you buy it? LOLOLOLOLOL! Convince yourself dufus.

I can't respond to this, you're a certified Loony!



JohnM