A straight line

[John Iacoletti]

Pretty sure Brennan said 'approximately'

You're pretty sure about a lot of things.  How does that position even equate to "about his belt up"?  Do you think the shooter had a belt around his neck?  Can you illustrate it, or will you just continue to fall back on "Oswald did it, therefore he must have figured out a position like this"?

Nobody knows for sure beyond the tip of the box seen in Dillard what the exact position of the box setup was during the firing sequence. Therefore I, along with witness testimony, can claim that the shooter found a position that enabled him to aim downrange effectively and successfully claim his place in history.

Of course you can.  Because you start with a conclusion and try to make the evidence fit it.  Or more frequently ignore the evidence that doesn't fit it.

You are in the position of having not only to call each WC witness a liar, but also to tell us what they saw or didn't see.

I haven't called each WC witness a liar.  That's just something you keep making up to avoid having to argue the actual evidence.  That would make you the liar.

[Bill Chapman]

You're pretty sure about a lot of things.  How does that position even equate to "about his belt up"?  Do you think the shooter had a belt around his neck?  Can you illustrate it, or will you just continue to fall back on "Oswald did it, therefore he must have figured out a position like this"?

Of course you can.  Because you start with a conclusion and try to make the evidence fit it.  Or more frequently ignore the evidence that doesn't fit it.

I haven't called each WC witness a liar.  That's just something you keep making up to avoid having to argue the actual evidence.  That would make you the liar.

Are you calling Brennan a liar as well?

[John Iacoletti]

Are you calling Brennan a liar as well?

No, just you.

[John Iacoletti]

No one here can speak for the witnesses

Great.  Then Frazier saw a 2 foot long bag that was not CE 142, and Roger Craig saw a Mauser.

[Bill Chapman]

No, just you.

Cite

[John Iacoletti]

Cite

You accused me of calling every WC witness a liar.  You accused me of using the term "random guy" to refer to the shooter.  You accused me of claiming that "the only reason the DPD converged on the TT was solely because a man was reported for being suspected of not buying a ticket".  You accused me of "stating the facts as lies". 

Every time I ask you for a cite for one of these doozies, you go strangely silent.

[Bill Chapman]

Great.  Then Frazier saw a 2 foot long bag that was not CE 142, and Roger Craig saw a Mauser.

And that Buell wasn't paying attention. And that years later said he didn't want to be remembered as the one who drove the (still-prime-and-only) suspect to work. And agreed with Bug that a longer bag could could have been carried in such a way as to escape his attention.

And Craig's sister who said her brother Roger had mental issues all his life.

But of course you are here to explain what these people really meant.