Lack Of Damage To CE-399

[Walt Cakebread]

Here you go:

Thank you for your effort, but I was looking for the photo of this evidence.....

[Tim Nickerson]

Thank you for your effort, but I was looking for the photo of this evidence.....

You'll find a photo at the following link. The rifle is not in it. You can zoom in and see the envelope.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49656/m1/1/

[Walt Cakebread]

You'll find a photo at the following link. The rifle is not in it. You can zoom in and see the envelope.

https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth49656/m1/1/

Thank you.....   Since the paper bag isn't stained and destroyed in this photo we can be certain that this photo was taken when the FBI received the evidence at midnight on 11/22 63.   Is that correct?


And this is the list that accompanied the photo , is that correct?

[Gary Craig]

[Walt Cakebread]

The list says.....one bullet fragment from the body of Gov, John Connally.

The evidence envelope that was signed bu nurse Audrey Bell says  ' bullet fragments-  right arm"

I can't read the envelope in the photo but it appears to be the same envelope that Audrey bell signed which says FRAGMENTS ( plural) from right arm

So why the hell does the evidence list say FRAGMENT  ( singular) from Connally's body.....

[Walt Cakebread]

This same photo is printed on page 88 of Jess Curry's book  JFK  Assassination File  where it a bit easier to see.....



In Curry's book the items are numbered and there is a list accompaning the photo.....The Bullet Fragment is item number 3 .....And it obviously is a fairly large chunk of metal.....I would estimate it is about the size of a .22 caliber bullet ( 55 grains)   ..... The point is:.....  This photo precedes the magic bullet theory and the MBT  would have us believe that the Magic Bullet lost very little metal as it crashed through JFK and JBC  .....and yet this photo shows a BIG chunk of metal....

[Martin Weidmann]

Thank you.....   Since the paper bag isn't stained and destroyed in this photo we can be certain that this photo was taken when the FBI received the evidence at midnight on 11/22 63.   Is that correct?


And this is the list that accompanied the photo , is that correct?

Since the paper bag isn't stained and destroyed in this photo we can be certain that this photo was taken when the FBI received the evidence at midnight on 11/22 63.   Is that correct?

IMO it doesn't have to be the moment when the FBI received the evidence. It could have been taken earlier that evening. What the photo does do, is provide an explanation how fibers from the blanket could have gotten into the paper bag.

And this is the list that accompanied the photo , is that correct?

Actually, on the list is written what the FBI returned to the DPD the next day.

The document clearly shows that the three fragments handed in by Nurse Bell have already become one fragment. One can only wonder how that happened....