Lack Of Damage To CE-399

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 221012 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #357 on: April 15, 2020, 07:34:54 PM »
And to add to the general confusion about bullets and fragments, there's this;

between 1.56 and 2.18 it gets interesting


Whatever happened to the bullet she saw next to Kennedy?

"and ON THE CART, halfway between the earlobe and the shoulder, there was a bullet laying almost perpendicular there."

Why stop there? Let's add more to the general confusion about bullets and fragments.

I could see a bullet lodged between his ear and his shoulder

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #358 on: April 15, 2020, 11:49:28 PM »
An X ray is a 2D image. Hard to tell mass without depth, i.e. 3D.

There was more than one X-Ray taken of the thigh. There were three. Two anterior posterial views and one lateral view. Dr Gregory examined all three.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2020, 11:51:01 PM by Tim Nickerson »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #359 on: April 16, 2020, 04:12:06 PM »
Fair enough. I had not seen the actual receipt and only quoted from her ARRB statement. So, she did give it to Nolan after all.

However, although I am not at home and don't have access to all my files, I did check a hard drive with some material on it and came across a newspaper clip from the days of the HSCA. It does not say the name of the paper or an exact date, but mentions that HSCA investigators had finished talking to Audrey Bell. In the article it says that another Patrolman named C. Harbison was also given 3 fragments of a bullet that came from Connally's body. He turned them over to the FBI. My initial thought was that he must have been the other plain clothes officer with Nolan, but the article says that Harbison was given the three fragments on 11/25/63. Three days after Bell gave her fragments to Nolan. I wonder what happened to Harbison's fragments and why he - according to the article - was never called to testify.....

It does not say in the ARRB report that she was shown a photocopy nor that she could only make out the large fragment. And she did in fact say that the fragments were too small!

The ARRB report says: "When shown CE 842 (page 841 in Warren Commission Volume XVII), she said that the fragment(s) photographed in the container were too small, and were too few in number, to represent what she handled on 11/22/63."

As I said before, fair enough.

 the article says that Harbison was given the three fragments on 11/25/63. Three days after Bell gave her fragments to Nolan.

Item number 7 on the evidence list for 11/22/63 lists "Bullet fragments taken from body of of Governor Connally"    The note accompanying the description of  item #7 says....Mrs Audrey Bell, Operating room nurse , to Bob Nolan, DPS, to Capt. Fritz, to Crime lab, to FBI. 

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #360 on: April 16, 2020, 04:22:05 PM »
the article says that Harbison was given the three fragments on 11/25/63. Three days after Bell gave her fragments to Nolan.

Item number 7 on the evidence list for 11/22/63 lists "Bullet fragments taken from body of of Governor Connally"    The note accompanying the description of  item #7 says....Mrs Audrey Bell, Operating room nurse , to Bob Nolan, DPS, to Capt. Fritz, to Crime lab, to FBI. 

Walt, please read the preceding posts before you jump into the discussion.

The three fragments that Harbison were given on 11/25/63, while guarding the room where Connally was in, are not the same ones as those given by nurse Bell to Officer Nolan three days earlier. The record, as it currently stands, makes no mention of the Harbison fragments. All we have is what he told Earl Golz.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #361 on: April 16, 2020, 06:32:36 PM »
Walt, please read the preceding posts before you jump into the discussion.

The three fragments that Harbison were given on 11/25/63, while guarding the room where Connally was in, are not the same ones as those given by nurse Bell to Officer Nolan three days earlier. The record, as it currently stands, makes no mention of the Harbison fragments. All we have is what he told Earl Golz.

Walt, please read the preceding posts before you jump into the discussion.

I was merely stating information.....I have no dog in this hunt......

I merely pointed out that the evidence list of the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63, lists the fragments removed from Connally.

Are you suggesting that they removed more fragments from Connally three days later .....  That doesn't make sense.   


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #362 on: April 16, 2020, 06:59:30 PM »
the evidence list of the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63,

LOL.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8170
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #363 on: April 16, 2020, 07:02:23 PM »
Walt, please read the preceding posts before you jump into the discussion.

I was merely stating information.....I have no dog in this hunt......

I merely pointed out that the evidence list of the evidence that was turned over to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63, lists the fragments removed from Connally.

Are you suggesting that they removed more fragments from Connally three days later .....  That doesn't make sense.   

That's exactly why I said that you should have read the preceding posts. Then you would have known what my comments were about.

I'm not suggesting anything. I'm saying that I came across a newspaper article from the late 70's in which it says that Patrolman C. Harbison, who was guarding Connally's room at the hospital, was also given fragments of a bullet that came from Connally's body. This apparently happened on 11/25/63. Harbison claims he turned them over to the FBI but they haven't been seen since. Apparently this matter got the attention of HSCA investigators who - it seems - ultimately did nothing with it. Earl Golz brought it to the attention of the ARRB, which is mentioned in the memo I provided a link for in my earlier post.