Lack Of Damage To CE-399

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 220977 times)

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #385 on: April 19, 2020, 02:06:46 PM »
Bull. The magic partial palmprint didn’t get to the FBI until November 29th.

That means nothing. A dead body cant give a fingerprint. So the print was not lifted off Oswalds body after he died as Oliver Stone claimed in the JFK movie.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8159
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #386 on: April 19, 2020, 03:06:43 PM »
That means nothing. A dead body cant give a fingerprint. So the print was not lifted off Oswalds body after he died as Oliver Stone claimed in the JFK movie.

It is also near impossible to lift a print and leave no residue behind. The FBI examined the rifle on 11/23/63 and found no trace of a print.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #387 on: April 19, 2020, 07:08:08 PM »
That means nothing. A dead body cant give a fingerprint. So the print was not lifted off Oswalds body after he died as Oliver Stone claimed in the JFK movie.

Then what were the police doing at the funeral home with a fingerprint kit?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #388 on: April 19, 2020, 10:26:25 PM »
That means nothing. A dead body cant give a fingerprint. So the print was not lifted off Oswalds body after he died as Oliver Stone claimed in the JFK movie.

Actually, you can get prints off of a dead body with the use of ink.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #389 on: April 19, 2020, 10:28:52 PM »
It is also near impossible to lift a print and leave no residue behind. The FBI examined the rifle on 11/23/63 and found no trace of a print.

Near impossible? Where do you get that from?


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8159
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #390 on: April 19, 2020, 11:18:02 PM »
Near impossible? Where do you get that from?



The content of the letter you posted has nothing to do with risidue of a print being left behind when the print is lifted.

The FBI found not even a trace of a print on 11/23/63. When the rifle is returned to the DPD, Day has prints of Oswald's hand and palm available.

How easy would it be to stick such a print to the rifle and thus obtain the irregularities onto the lift?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #391 on: April 19, 2020, 11:42:09 PM »
The content of the letter you posted has nothing to do with risidue of a print being left behind when the print is lifted.

The FBI found not even a trace of a print on 11/23/63. When the rifle is returned to the DPD, Day has prints of Oswald's hand and palm available.

How easy would it be to stick such a print to the rifle and thus obtain the irregularities onto the lift?

Besides, let’s see the actual examination. We got a claim from Hoover and a smudge.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2020, 11:53:10 PM by John Iacoletti »