Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting  (Read 237773 times)

Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #266 on: February 03, 2019, 04:41:44 PM »
Norman never changed his time approximation for 3 shots fired which is according to his several interviews recorded including also at the mock trial, has 3 shots fired in less than 5 seconds.

His WC testimony also states he heard the 1st shot, saw JFK "slump" and then heard the next 2 shots


Mr. NORMAN. I believe it was his right arm, and I can't remember what the exact time was but I know I heard a shot, and then after I heard the shot, well, it seems as though the President, you know, slumped or something, and then another shot and I believe Jarman or someone told me, he said, "I believe someone is shooting at the President," and I think I made a statement "It is someone shooting at the President, and I believe it came from up above us."
Well, I couldn't see at all during the time but I know I heard a third shot fired, and I could also hear something sounded like the shell hulls hitting the floor and the ejecting of the rifle, it sounded as though it was to me



so if Norman heard these 3 shots in less than 5 seconds as per his several video taped interviews as he does his boom clak clak sequence renactiment, then the 1st shot Norman is hearing and then seeing the President slump, must be the shot at Z223

Yet there are many other witnesses who claim to have heard the first shot much earlier. There's the testimony of Couch, Dillard, Jackson and Underwood who heard the first shot when their convertible was either just entering Houston St. form Main St. or was further along Houston St. I would be interested to know the position of their car in relation to that of the presidents limo when they heard the first shot. Calling Jerry Organ!!!!!

Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #267 on: February 03, 2019, 04:52:50 PM »
Like cherry picking Norman"s, 12.15 from one statement as a time for their ascent. Pot....kettle.

Bonnie Ray was not the most reliable witness regarding any placement, movement or timing was he? Wonder why. He just happened to be in the SN up until about 12.25. No pressure on him.

Norman's 12:15 is not a stand alone piece of evidence. There's Arce and Givens statements of NO BRW with Jarman and Norman so.....where was BRW at 12:15 PM? His testimony before the WC says 6th floor, behind third set of windows or thereabouts. You're basing your claim that BRW had to be IN the SN on the testimony of Arnold Rowland...am I right?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #268 on: February 03, 2019, 09:03:23 PM »
Yeah, the cover up that involved dozens of people from all over the country that to this day has yet to produce a single piece of evidence that indicates that the final conclusions reached by the WC was in error. That is, that LHO killed both JFK, wounded JBC, and killed Officer Tippit without outside assistance. Let's add that Oswald also took a pot shot at General Walker. I might have worded this statement a bit confusing. After 55 years, three further investigations and, I guess, millions of declassified documents, no evidence has been uncovered that would lead to the conclusion that the essential conclusions reached by the WC are not valid.
Well there it is everybody....the definitive solution! Why then post any further? What more can be said? Why wile away any more time on these benign arguments? Just curious ::)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #269 on: February 03, 2019, 09:22:41 PM »
Well there it is everybody....the definitive solution! Why then post any further? What more can be said? Why wile away any more time on these benign arguments? Just curious ::)

Are you askin Navarro why he wastin time attacking CT's and lying about the case, if LBJ's Special select Blue Ribbon Committee's "essential  conclusions" are accurate and valid....?   

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #270 on: February 03, 2019, 09:56:46 PM »
Are you askin Navarro why he wastin time attacking CT's and lying about the case, if LBJ's Special select Blue Ribbon Committee's "essential  conclusions" are accurate and valid....?   
  The lone shooter guys = horses in this condition-- 

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #271 on: February 04, 2019, 05:15:04 AM »
Norman's 12:15 is not a stand alone piece of evidence. There's Arce and Givens statements of NO BRW with Jarman and Norman so.....where was BRW at 12:15 PM? His testimony before the WC says 6th floor, behind third set of windows or thereabouts. You're basing your claim that BRW had to be IN the SN on the testimony of Arnold Rowland...am I right?

No....wrong again. Seems to be a pattern.

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Oswald in the TSBD just after the shooting
« Reply #272 on: February 04, 2019, 05:37:08 AM »
Yeah, the cover up that involved dozens of people from all over the country that to this day has yet to produce a single piece of evidence that indicates that the final conclusions reached by the WC was in error. That is, that LHO killed both JFK, wounded JBC, and killed Officer Tippit without outside assistance. Let's add that Oswald also took a pot shot at General Walker. I might have worded this statement a bit confusing. After 55 years, three further investigations and, I guess, millions of declassified documents, no evidence has been uncovered that would lead to the conclusion that the essential conclusions reached by the WC are not valid.
Oscar you don't need to yell

Question: What does WC stand for?
Answer: Warren Commission
Oscar's Answer: Warren Court of law
 
Funny, I don't remember this case being tried in a court of law and there lies your problem, Oscar,  but I see it's all or nothing with you