The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?  (Read 84509 times)

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #35 on: January 02, 2019, 01:55:29 AM »
The magic bullet theory is ridiculous. It was created by conspiracy screwballs. I reject it entirely.
 The Single Bullet Theory remains standing, Firm and unchallengeable.
And the difference is....?  Either way we are still calling it a THEORY. And it is the stupidest theory I have ever heard of.  BTW there is no such word as 'unchallengeable'. You might look up the word-----
Unproven=doubtful, uncertain..suspicious..problematic..dubious..debatable..controversial..ambiguous       
   

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #36 on: January 02, 2019, 01:56:15 AM »
A direct strike by a intact bullet traveling at near muzzle velocity would have done much more damage to that chrome piece. Nobody familiar with rifles would think that it was a direct strike from a bullet.

near muzzle velocity?
like point blank?
Do you have a clue what you are talking about?
So what was that strike then?
perhaps a bumblebee on amphetamines?

It could happen!

hey sorry bud no offence but

unchallengeable
/ʌnˈtʃalɪn(d)ʒəb(ə)l/Submit
adjective
not able to be disputed, opposed, or defeated.
"the unchallengeable truth of these basic facts"

its a word

Scrabble anyone?
« Last Edit: January 02, 2019, 02:00:52 AM by Eddie Haymaker »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #37 on: January 02, 2019, 03:32:37 AM »
There is also such a word as umpteenth and that's how many magic bullet threads that have been posted on this forum in the past year. Why start another one? It has always managed to be challenged. 

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #38 on: January 02, 2019, 04:33:43 AM »
And the difference is....? 

The difference is that the Magic bullet Theory has the bullet zig zagging in mid air, stopping in midair, and moving up and down between the sniper's nest and the entry point on Connally's back. The Single Bullet Theory has none of that. It has the bullet traveling in a straight line trajectory from the sniper's nest, through Kennedy's neck, and then to the entry point on Connally's back.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #39 on: January 02, 2019, 04:36:10 AM »

So what was that strike then?

What part of  "A fragment from the head shot" don't you understand?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #40 on: January 02, 2019, 05:00:26 AM »
The Single Bullet Theory...
But it is still just a theory...a could have been. There could have been other shots from other shooters...also a theory. Neither theory was really explored much it seems. CE 399 was worshiped as the one true explanation of everything and so the story ends.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?
« Reply #41 on: January 02, 2019, 05:07:32 AM »
But it is still just a theory...a could have been. There could have been other shots from other shooters...also a theory. Neither theory was really explored much it seems. CE 399 was worshiped as the one true explanation of everything and so the story ends.

The "other shots from other shooters" theory has no support. There's no evidence for it and it doesn't stand up at all under any scrutiny. CE399 wasn't worshiped. It just was. It exists. It is evidence that fits very well with the Single Bullet Theory.