Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?  (Read 47846 times)

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #42 on: December 21, 2018, 12:16:14 AM »
All you guys do is shout people down .

you cannot deny the fact Senator Russell thought it was unbelievable himself

and so did the sitting president of the united states

who QUICKLY agree's

you've all heard the telephone call

you guy's are holier than the pope himself, Its laughable

GTFO

lone nutters are the minority now

and getting smaller everyday

Hee-Haw

Wasn't the final legal verdict on the assasination a probable conspiracy?

« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 12:36:38 AM by Eddie Haymaker »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #43 on: December 21, 2018, 12:28:12 AM »
Huh?

Marty, you're comparing 2 events which are non congruous.
The competition I was clearly refering to was never between two debaters but to what actually happened which has already been proven beyond all doubt by the overwhelming evidence and as pointed out, the sbf only happened one way so logically there is no other alternative and therefore in a one horse race there can be no competition and has zero do do with your doppelganger Eddie conceding that yes in fact I had already won.

JohnM

The competition I was clearly refering to was never between two debaters

Of course it wasn't....pfffff  :D.  You've been playing this game for years, so pull the other one, Johnny!

what actually happened which has already been proven beyond all doubt by the overwhelming evidence 

In your not so modest opinion, of course....

the sbf only happened one way so logically there is no other alternative

There's nothing logical about claiming something happened one way when you can't prove it and the alternative is simply that it didn't happen at all.

in a one horse race there can be no competition

Very true, but in your kind of one horse race, your horse always loses.... why is that?

Eddie conceding that yes in fact I had already won.

I'm sure your ego got a boost from that one. Too bad the sarcasm went over your head.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 12:47:17 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #44 on: December 21, 2018, 12:30:21 AM »
Please stop drawing your fancy computer pictures

and illustrated diagrams

why don't you use the WR diagrams?

they are my favourites

It is widely accepted the bullet entered at or about

the third thoracic vertebrae

"The President's death certificate places the wound at the third thoracic vertebra, which corresponds to the holes in the coat and shirt. This document was also marked verified."

Thats 5-6 inches down from the collar folks

please do this for me at home and get your partner to put their finger on your back there.Then try to explain how that bullet travels through to your neck and without smashing the spinal column.please try this at home.Feel how LOW that is?

FBI says 21 degrees down angle from the TSBD

At autopsy the Dr could feel the bottom of the back wound with his pinky finger

forget about this "bunched shirt bologna"  lets not re-invent the wheel

We know exactly where the wound was - another LN'er red herring

case closed - weak sauce
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 01:28:47 AM by Eddie Haymaker »

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #45 on: December 21, 2018, 02:01:48 AM »
Bunched or not bunched the SBT is impossible and unsupportable.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #46 on: December 21, 2018, 02:05:19 AM »
It's no longer the SBT it's the SBFact.

You can't even support the contention that LHO used an alias, but you claim that the SBT is fact!. Hilarious.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #47 on: December 21, 2018, 02:10:23 AM »
Caprio once claimed that JFK's clothes couldn't bunch because he wore expensive, tailored made suits from Brooks Brothers.  You can't make that kind of comedy gold up.  The pictures clearly provide the answer but CTers never let the facts get in the way of a far out fantasy.

I never said that his expensive clothes came from Brooks Brothers. Fibber.

DVP always said "comedy gold" too. At least I have given you a "belly laugh". Speaking of making things up -- SBT.

Bunch or no bunch the SBT is impossible and unsupportable.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #48 on: December 21, 2018, 03:29:07 AM »
lone nutters are the minority now

and getting smaller everyday

Hee-Haw
I see no evidence that LNers are currently losing ground.

LNers are not the only ones who have been in the minority for a long time.
People who believed that slavery should be abolished in the United States were in the minority for decades, over two centuries. Right up to 1865.
People who believed that the Earth moves were in the minority.
Having a majority of the people in America who believe the Theory of Evolution is true is in jeopardy if he hasn?t already been lost.

What impresses me is not how few people believed the Earth moved 350 years ago. What impresses me is that the minority who did were the ones who really studied the matter and approached problems with logic and the Scientific Method.
Today the people who really know what they are talking about, who conduct real world ballistic tests, the ballistic experts, all find the Single Bullet Theory to be very plausible and most likely true. People like Luke and Michael Haag.
After over 50 years, CTers have not found a single Ballistic expert who thinks otherwise. A person who conducts real life ballistic tests and is called upon to present his evidence in court. Not in the U. S. Not in Canada. Not in Europe, or Japan, or India, or anywhere.

So, it doesn?t matter how many people who never conduct ballistic tests believe the SBT is false, or how many people who don?t know what a telescope is believe the Earth is stationary. I won?t begin to bulge from my opinion until CTers can produce a ballistic expert who thinks the SBT is wrong.