Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?  (Read 47833 times)

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #49 on: December 21, 2018, 06:42:15 AM »
Slavery? are you kidding?

A bit dramatic, jeez you're not a martyr

we are the ones trying to expose this enormous and obvious lie (WR)

No evidence you're losing ground?

Go back and read this whole thread


You don't have to budge though bud

You don't care how many people disagree?

Not even one of the commissioners or the president himself so...

I cannot trump that - but nor can you

BTW the magic bullet is not science - its magic


The house select committee on assassinations believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.


There it is from your US Government

Can you guys stop flogging this dead donkey?
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 07:15:08 AM by Eddie Haymaker »

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #50 on: December 21, 2018, 08:17:52 AM »

The house select committee on assassinations believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy.


There it is from your US Government

Do you know why the committee delivered that finding? Have you wondered why that finding is very rarely brought up in discussions even by devout CTs?

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #51 on: December 21, 2018, 09:59:31 AM »
pray tell

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #52 on: December 21, 2018, 02:19:14 PM »
All you guys do is shout people down .

you cannot deny the fact Senator Russell thought it was unbelievable himself

and so did the sitting president of the united states

who QUICKLY agree's

you've all heard the telephone call

you guy's are holier than the pope himself, Its laughable

GTFO

lone nutters are the minority now

and getting smaller everyday

Hee-Haw

Wasn't the final legal verdict on the assasination a probable conspiracy?

    You need to add Dr. Humes to your list of SBT Non-Believers.

Offline Eddie Haymaker

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #53 on: December 21, 2018, 03:19:02 PM »
I mean how credible is that?

Senator Richard Russell?

Not exactly a civil rights advocate

an old friend of LBJ's

He still cannot bring himself to sign off on that BS


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #54 on: December 21, 2018, 03:44:46 PM »
I mean how credible is that?

Senator Richard Russell?

Not exactly a civil rights advocate

an old friend of LBJ's

He still cannot bring himself to sign off on that BS

    LBJ made sure he stacked the WC. His ace-in-the-hole being Gerry Ford.  Ford moved the location of JFK's back wound and was the FBI/Hoover's eyes and ears inside the WC. No job was too big or too small for this soon to be appointed President.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?
« Reply #55 on: December 21, 2018, 06:27:45 PM »
Since the jacket has been shown to have bunched up -- and the shirt had a similar pattern of displacement, as the bullet holes in the jacket and shirt demonstrate -- then the shirt must have been bunched up. The shirt being lighter material, it was probably bunched up near the shirt collar in a series of wrinkles. The jacket was of denser material and bunched up in a single bunch.



The sternum (which somewhat resembles a necktie) is clearly below the exit site shown in the line drawing.

Ford thought the initial description (something like above the shoulder) was too vague (sounds to me like it could even be read as a missed shot). Ford convinced the other Commissioners to employ a description that better reflected what was in the autopsy report. Nothing was "moved." It's a little incidental thing that really captured the imagination of the conspiracy-minded.

    Who/What is the source of your "....ABOVE the shoulder" initial description of the BACK Wound?  Unless that is referencing a different/additional wound, that description is Not in close proximity to the BACK wound notated on the autopsy face sheet and photographed at the autopsy. Oh, and who wears the knot in their necktie BELOW the collar bone? Hilarious visual aid chicanery.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2018, 06:30:02 PM by Royell Storing »