USPS workers screwing things up i.e..LHO receiving c2766

[Oscar Navarro]

Actually, this entire forum is evidence of the fact that the WC and HSCA over exaggerated the evidence. That's why we are still talking about this case 55 years later.

No, it is not in the OP. You have not presented a shred of evidence to support the claim that postal workers simply screwed up when they gave Oswald a package addressed to Hidell?.

What is in the OP is an example of how postal workers can screw up combined with your "it could have happened here also" argument

Actually, this entire forum is evidence of the fact that the WC and HSCA over exaggerated the evidence. That's why we are still talking about this case 55 years later.

Present evidence of the alleged over exaggeration of evidence. BTW, did the WC exaggerate all or some of the evidence? If some, which evidence is kosher?

No, it is not in the OP. You have not presented a shred of evidence to support the claim that postal workers simply screwed up when they gave Oswald a package addressed to Hidell?.
What is in the OP is an example of how postal workers can screw up combined with your "it could have happened here also" argument

The OP was not intended to show evidence that Postal workers actually screwed up but to illustrate that if there were Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from giving Oswald the rifle, that said postal worker could have simply screwed up. Capiche! Are you aware of any Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from handing Oswald the rifle or was Holmes right?

[Bill Chapman]

'could of happened'

It's "could have happened"! Try to get something right for once!

LOL

That's all you've got, Martin? Not that you're desperate. No, not you..
 
Let's talk about is right here: Firstly, none of you lot can show that anyone but the shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day.

Secondly, what's right is that Lee Harvey Oswald was the only man on the planet who was positively identified as being at the scene during both murders.

[Oscar Navarro]

This is going to be another one of those "I stand corrected" moments for Oscar Navarro.

Name these dozen examples, and show even one example where Oswald used Hidell as an alias for himself.

1) Using Hidell to order the rifle from Klein's

2)Using Hidell as the addressee in the envelope to Klein's

3) Using Hidell to order the revolver from Seaport Traders

4)Using D. F. Drittal as a character witness in the Seaport Traders mail order coupon

5) Using Hidell on the FPCC flyers handed out in NO

6) Using Hidell in forged selective service card

7) Using Hidell as an authorized person to receive mail in his NO PO box

FPCC card with Hidell as chapter president

9) Use of Sgt. Robert Hidell as reference in job application for Riley Coffee in NO

10) Use of Lt. J. Evans as reference in job application for Riley Coffee

11) Told Agent Quigley that Hidell told him to hand out the FPCC flyers

12) using O. H. Lee as alias at rooming house in N. Beckley

13) probably using Hidell as addresse in envelope addressed to Seaport Traders

14) using ficticious doctor in forged immunization card

15) use of Osborne in ordering FPCC flyers in NO


That should co it for now. Since Oswald's life was not as the one depicted in the movie Truman it's impossible to know when or if Oswald used Hidell directly as himself. Now comes the typical John denial that any of this is evidence that Oswald used aliases, specially Hidell.

[Martin Weidmann]

Actually, this entire forum is evidence of the fact that the WC and HSCA over exaggerated the evidence. That's why we are still talking about this case 55 years later.

Present evidence of the alleged over exaggeration of evidence. BTW, did the WC exaggerate all or some of the evidence? If some, which evidence is kosher?

Stop asking the same question.

BTW, did the WC exaggerate all or some of the evidence? If some, which evidence is kosher?

That's a good question. Keep it in mind the next time you rely without hesitation on anything they have claimed.

And before you ask again; I have no intention of going through the entire report making some sort of "kosher" list,

No, it is not in the OP. You have not presented a shred of evidence to support the claim that postal workers simply screwed up when they gave Oswald a package addressed to Hidell?.
What is in the OP is an example of how postal workers can screw up combined with your "it could have happened here also" argument

The OP was not intended to show evidence that Postal workers actually screwed up but to illustrate that if there were Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from giving Oswald the rifle, that said postal worker could have simply screwed up. Capiche! Are you aware of any Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from handing Oswald the rifle or was Holmes right?

The OP was not intended to show evidence that Postal workers actually screwed up but to illustrate that if there were Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from giving Oswald the rifle, that said postal worker could have simply screwed up.

If the OP was not intended to show evidence that Postal workers actually screwed up, then what was this all about;

and evidence of such screw up was presented. Comprende!

Where, when and by whom was "evidence of such screw up" presented? 

It's in the OP.

And yes, we already knew that Postal workers could have screwed up but that doesn't mean they did, and even if they did, it could also mean that anybody could have picked up the package addressed to Hidell. Haven't you just destroyed your own claim that Oswald collected the rifle due to a possible screw up?

Are you aware of any Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal worker from handing Oswald (or anybody else) the rifle or was Holmes right?

There I fixed it for you.

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL

That's all you've got, Martin? Not that you're desperate. No, not you..
 

Just trying to be helpfull

[Walt Cakebread]

You have no idea if Oswald used the rifle at all.

But if the scope was never intended to be used, then the narrative would be that he disassembled and reassembled the rifle and in doing so included a scope that he didn't intend to use.  Makes perfect sense.

Walt really seems to be losing it with his rants.  Again, you have no idea if Oswald used the scope, what condition the scope was in at the time of the assassination (by the time it had been fired for accuracy it had been dropped behind some boxes and it may have been disassembled looking for prints) and how often Oswald had practiced with it to compensate for any imperfection.  At the end of the day Frazier confirmed that the rifle was highly accurate.

Walt really seems to be losing it with his rants.

The little man asked how I knew that Lee Oswald used the scope ( when he shot JFK, which obviously was a loaded question) ... I had pointed out that the scope was mounted askew and the bullets were impacting more than four inches from the aiming point at a range of a mere 15 yards so therefore NOBODY could have hit JFK with that rifle because the bullets would have been yards off target at a range of 100 yards.

My reply was I don't believe that Lee nor anybody else fired the rifle that day...  That reply answers the question....

(by the time it had been fired for accuracy it had been dropped behind some boxes

Oh my goodness... Now Chappie is claiming to have been right there on site and observed the rifle being dropped behind some boxes ...  ( unless he was there he could not know how the rifle was handled)  ...and he makes this claim in contradiction to the two officers who actually found the rifle....Seymour Weitzman said that he spotted the rifle when he got down on the floor and shined his flashlight BENEATH the pallet of books ...It was Not simply BEHIND some boxes....

[Steve Howsley]

Oh my goodness... Now Chappie is claiming to have been right there on site and observed the rifle being dropped behind some boxes ...  ( unless he was there he could not know how the rifle was handled)  ...

It's hilarious how you often refer to the rifle as being carefully placed ...

How would you know? Were you there?

Common sense says it is more likely dropped as Oswald was in a hurry to grab a Coke before heading off to the movies.

I can just imagine him jumping for joy "Whoopee, the POTUS has been shot. I reckon I'll take the rest of the day off."