USPS workers screwing things up i.e..LHO receiving c2766

[Martin Weidmann]

I rely on the evidence as presented by the WC and supported by the HSCA. If you believe they have "over exaggerated" the evidence then present evidence of that "over exaggeration" instead of just questioning the evidence and nitpicking ad nauseum.

Actually, this entire forum is evidence of the fact that the WC and HSCA over exaggerated the evidence. That's why we are still talking about this case 55 years later.

Where, when and by whom was "evidence of such screw up" presented? So far, in this thread, all I have seen is a classic "could have happened" LN argument.

It's in the OP.

No, it is not in the OP. You have not presented a shred of evidence to support the claim that postal workers simply screwed up when they gave Oswald a package addressed to Hidell?.

What is in the OP is an example of how postal workers can screw up combined with your "it could have happened here also" argument

[Bill Chapman]

I rely on evidence.

No. You over exaggerate the signicifance of pieces of evidence in order to make them fit the narrative.

If that was the case, and I'm not saying it was, postal clerks screw up just as all human beings are prone to do and evidence of such screw up was presented.

Where, when and by whom was "evidence of such screw up" presented? So far, in this thread, all I have seen is a classic "could have happened" LN argument.

Given the plethora of conflicting conspiracy-monger books claiming this, that and the other... yet with none able to replace the prime suspect or prove that anyone other than the said prime suspect knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, it seems to me that your 'could of happened' describes you lot perfectly.

[Bill Chapman]

Actually, this entire forum is evidence of the fact that the WC and HSCA over exaggerated the evidence. That's why we are still talking about this case 55 years later.

No, we are still talking about this due to the conspiracy-monger mindset

[Martin Weidmann]

Given the plethora of conflicting conspiracy-monger books claiming this, that and the other... yet with none able to replace the prime suspect or prove that anyone other than the said prime suspect knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day, it seems to me that your 'could of happened' describes you lot perfectly.

'could of happened'

It's "could have happened"! Try to get something right for once!

[John Iacoletti]

Me;
But it wasn't addressed to LHO.

Hidell was an Oswald alias just as O. H. Lee was another alias used by Oswald at the N. Beckley rooming house. There's about a dozen examples of Oswald using Hidell as an alias or to represent a ficticious doctor in the forged immunization form and there's Marina's testimony about Oswald using Hidell. Jesus Christ, what the hell is wrong with you CTers. The evidence for this  Oswald = Hidell stands out like a Mike Tyson face tattoo.

This is going to be another one of those "I stand corrected" moments for Oscar Navarro.

Name these dozen examples, and show even one example where Oswald used Hidell as an alias for himself.

[John Iacoletti]

I rely on evidence. The purpose of the original post is to illustrate that some CTers make a big deal about there not being any proof that Oswald could have received the rifle because, according to some CTers, there were Postal regulations that would have prevented a postal clerk from giving the package containing the rifle, and addressed to A. Hidell, because there's no proof that Hidell was on the list of those authorized to receive mail at the PO box. If that was the case, and I'm not saying it was, postal clerks screw up just as all human beings are prone to do and evidence of such screw up was presented. Comprende!

If postal clerks can screw up (and I agree that they can, not necessarily that they did -- that would require evidence that you say you rely on), then why are you so sure that Oswald picked up this package from Klein's (even if you could prove it was ever delivered to the PO box)?

[John Iacoletti]

Walt really seems to be losing it with his rants.  Again, you have no idea if Oswald used the scope,

You have no idea if Oswald used the rifle at all.

But if the scope was never intended to be used, then the narrative would be that he disassembled and reassembled the rifle and in doing so included a scope that he didn't intend to use.  Makes perfect sense.