Proof JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

You have never been so wrong in your life.
  oh boy.

1) Are you stating that Mr. Zapruder, who was there and stated that a shot came from behind him is wrong?
Where did I mention Zapruder?
2) Are you stating that Mr. Newman, who was there and stated that a shot came from behind him is wrong?
Where did I mention Newman?
3) Are you stating that the Mary Moorman photo from NBC News is a fake?  NBC News is in a conspiracy to provide fake images from Mary Moorman.
No , but that colorized POS with the insinuated human forms is pure crap.
4) Are you stating that the Nix Film has been altered to show gunshots from the very place that Mr. Zapruder and Mr. Newman said they heard shots from and the Mary Moreman photo shows a man standing there?
Did I mention Nix?
If you believe that 1-4 are fabricated, that is your opinion, show proof that they are fabricated.
So your opinions have more weight than my opinions? I'm speaking about real life professional experience. All this other kook speak is you playing detective then offering up your inexperienced opinion.
5) What type of enclosure are those guns fired in?  Are they fired in an open pergola similar to the one at the grassy knoll?  Can you share in this forum the type of enclosure being used and certify that those tests were done in that enclosure?
See the answer to number 4.

"So either your shooter(s) had a suppressed firearm , was wearing hearing protection or nobody fired anything from the pergola as per that phony doctored up Moorman photo that you proffered up as evidence showed." - These are your words, not mine, what else could you be insinuating here?  If you are talking about the colored portion of the picture, show proof that it is different from the original besides that fact that it is colorized.  Who are you kidding, you are just basing your conclusion on your opinion.  Show proof!

You have 30 years experience, act like it! - Just cause you are consumed with another belief does not mean it is so.

[Steve Logan]

"So either your shooter(s) had a suppressed firearm , was wearing hearing protection or nobody fired anything from the pergola as per that phony doctored up Moorman photo that you proffered up as evidence showed." - These are your words, not mine, what else could you be insinuating here?  If you are talking about the colored portion of the picture, show proof that it is different from the original besides that fact that it is colorized.  Who are you kidding, you are just basing your conclusion on your opinion.  Show proof!

You have 30 years experience, act like it! - Just cause you are consumed with another belief does not mean it is so.

If you are talking about the colored portion of the picture, show proof that it is different from the original besides that fact that it is colorized.  Who are you kidding, you are just basing your conclusion on your opinion.

No I'm basing my opinion on experience with shooting firearms. Your presenting crap from Blevins that is supported by that lunatic of lunatics Ralph Cinque. Your credibility is in question. You're silly.

[Nicholas Turner]

A belief that it is a fact. What is the difference? It is obvious to the discerning mind that there was a cover-up and so it is not just a theory.
                             Nicholas Katzenbach Asst Attorney General November 25 1963, the day of the Kennedy funeral.       
You may have the last word there Mr Turner, but it probably won't mean too much in the long range scope of things. Cheers

You don't see a difference between a belief and a fact?  Surprised.

By the way, the phrase 'just a theory' is misleading. A theory is not a guess but a model which explains observations supported by evidence and which can be tested.

I have I think there was an attempt to cover up mistakes that were made in the lead up to the assassination but wouldn't say I know that to be true.

Cheers to you

[Nicholas Turner]

Says the guy who offers his unsupported opinion all the time. Who cares indeed?

My point is, which you have clearly missed, is that I and others are expressing opinions. I don't claim them to be facts unlike some.

[Nicholas Turner]

If he was the only one to say this then it would be open to debate, but he wasn't. The majority of witnesses in DP said that shots originated where Zapruder said.

Could you give a citation which shows this to be true please.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

If you are talking about the colored portion of the picture, show proof that it is different from the original besides that fact that it is colorized.  Who are you kidding, you are just basing your conclusion on your opinion.

No I'm basing my opinion on experience with shooting firearms. Your presenting crap from Blevins that is supported by that lunatic of lunatics Ralph Cinque. Your credibility is in question. You're silly.

Since you have 30-years law enforcement experience, give me a nationally respected crime lab that I can use to analyze the Mary Moorman picture.

P.S. - I am not presenting anything from anyone else.  The facts are the facts, and you have not debunked this fact.

[Royell Storing]

Bottom line is I don't believe on anything JFK unless I can see proof.  I see proof of shots being fired from the pergola.  Whether Zapruder or Sitzman are involved, that is a different thread.  I am not concerned about their actions in this thread. 

BTW - Mr. Zapruder did report that he heard shots fired from right behind him.  He reported as such in the form of a TV interview minutes after the assassination and his Warren Commission testimony.

    You claim to want PROOF, and now You are misquoting Abe Zapruder right after You misquoted Bill Newman. Zapruder did Not say he heard shots fired from "RIGHT Behind Him". Zapruder did WC Testify to DPD motorcycle cops being Right behind him, but he did Not claim the shots fired were "RIGHT Behind Him" during his WC Testimony or during his TV Interview shortly after the assassination.