I was addressing point #4 and yet you felt a need to include the other three. Why is that?
As far as Newman goes, he clearly recounts what made him think the shot came from over his head ?It was the visual impact [of the fatal shot] that made me think the shot came down over our head,? he said. ?In all honesty, I have no idea where the shot came from.?---Bill Newman
I'll address your claim of seeing smoke a little later; although Jerry has already shown that the shape your smoke is actually a tree.
Those are your opinions not facts. You are taking what he said 49 years later as gospel.
Mr. Newman's initial statement on TV (a couple hours after the assassination) is that the shots came from the shelter (pergola). This is an undeniable fact. He said so. It is further validated by Mr. Zapruder's initial statement in the same TV newscast that the bullets came from behind him. Also an undeniable fact. The Mary Moorman photo shows someone behind him, an undeniable fact.
The following has been proven: 1. Mr. Zapruder said a shot came from behind him. 2. Mr. Newman said a shot came from the shelter, 3. A person is shown in the Mary Moorman photo behind Mr. Zapruder and Ms. Sitsman, 4. The Nix film shows a shot being fired from the shelter, and 5. Photographs show clouds of gunsmoke seconds after the assassination.
There is further proof of a shot from the shelter from testimony said in the Warren Commission by police officers and secret service men.
The five points and the statements of the Warren Commission as a collective show strong evidence of a shot from the pergola and thus strong proof that JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy.
Bill, you clearly show a disdain for facts. Why is that?