Corroboration of Assassination films

[Royell Storing]

Give it up, Storing.  You, as usual, have nothing. Abraham was not a stupid man, and he didn't know the film in detail the way researchers and students of the assassination did/do. 

 His answer to the question...you can twist that into whatever you want, but it proves nothing because we know that Zapruder didn't want anything to do with the film and didn't even want a copy of the film because it horrified him.  That you take three words and try to  mold them into something to fit your agenda is just more proof of exactly how desperate you are!

   During his Clay-Shaw testimony Zapruder also testified that he could see the JFK Motorcade coming down Houston and then turning onto Elm. This corroborates Sitzman telling Tink Thompson likewise during her being interviewed for his groundbreaking "Six Seconds In Dallas". The JFK Limo suddenly POPPING into the Z Film and already traveling down Elm St flies in the face of the Zapruder testimony and the Sitzman interview = Alteration.

[Steve Barber]

   During his Clay-Shaw testimony Zapruder also testified that he could see the JFK Motorcade coming down Houston and then turning onto Elm. This corroborates Sitzman telling Tink Thompson likewise during her being interviewed for his groundbreaking "Six Seconds In Dallas". The JFK Limo suddenly POPPING into the Z Film and already traveling down Elm St flies in the face of the Zapruder testimony and the Sitzman interview = Alteration.

  The one and only thing altered here is your brain.  You say the stupidest things, Storing.  Its how you kill so many threads in here!

[Jerry Freeman]

   During his Clay-Shaw testimony Zapruder also testified that he could see the JFK Motorcade coming down Houston and then turning onto Elm. 

He was just not experienced with the camera. It was amazing that he filmed anything at all without completely choking the technique of viewing while pressing the shutter button. So, he could 'see the car as it turned' but did he film the car as it turned? Did he say that? Or was it simply a case of low self esteem because he forgot to start filming the movie at the onset?
 

[Royell Storing]

He was just not experienced with the camera. It was amazing that he filmed anything at all without completely choking the technique of viewing while pressing the shutter button. So, he could 'see the car as it turned' but did he film the car as it turned? Did he say that? Or was it simply a case of low self esteem because he forgot to start filming the movie at the onset?
 

     One of the numerous JFK Assassination Urban Legends is that Zapruder did Not See/Know where the JFK Limo was as it traveled down Houston St and then turned onto Elm St. This explains why Zapruder allegedly Started/Stopped/Re-Started his filming resulting in the JFK Limo Suddenly POPPING into the Current Zapruder Film traveling down Elm St. The Zapruder Testimony during the Clay-Shaw trial corroborated the Sitzman interview conducted by Tink Thompson. Both Zapruder and Sitzman said they could see the JFK Motorcade coming down Houston St and turning onto Elm St. 

[Jack Trojan]

If Zapruder stopped the camera during the turn onto Elm then the "1st frame overexposure effect" would have been evident, but it wasn't. Face it LNers. there was "stuff" edited from the Z-film during the turn onto Elm when Oswald should have taken the 1st shot. This proves that the Z-film was tampered with, which is why the original film has been with-held from the public. You LNers need to stop being shills for the bastages that killed JFK and wake up!

[Michael Walton]

The Nix and Zapruder cameras had different frame rates.  So somebody made them match up.

John, what you don't seem to understand is that if you have two different cameras capturing the exact same scene and each one is running at a different frame rate, you can't [edited] change what's actually being recorded just because one or the other has more frames going through the gate.

The NZ sync video I posted proves that.

But for argument's sake, let's say that in Z for example, some frames were removed.  What exactly was removed...in other words, what was so dastardly that some frames needed to be removed? No one for the past 55 years has ever been able to answer this question.

To be honest, I'm really surprised that you brought this up, John. You seem like one of the more level-headed ones around here.

[Royell Storing]

John, what you don't seem to understand is that if you have two different cameras capturing the exact same scene and each one is running at a different frame rate, you can't [edited] change what's actually being recorded just because one or the other has more frames going through the gate.

The NZ sync video I posted proves that.

But for argument's sake, let's say that in Z for example, some frames were removed.  What exactly was removed...in other words, what was so dastardly that some frames needed to be removed? No one for the past 55 years has ever been able to answer this question.

To be honest, I'm really surprised that you brought this up, John. You seem like one of the more level-headed ones around here.

        Z frame(s) might have been removed due to their revealing a 4th shot striking the street, curb, grass, etc. This evidence of another shot having been fired would Prove at least 1 additional shooter = Conspiracy.  The filming of the JFK Limo as it turned onto and proceeded down Elm St would have revealed the Records Bld at that point in time. Also, remember the shallow bullet hole in the back of JFK. The shallow depth of this wound would be indicative of either a deflected bullet, fragment, and or a shot fired from more of a Horizontal Position vs the Height of the TSBD 6th floor. Again, this would Prove at least 1 additional shooter.