Corroboration of Assassination films

[Jerry Freeman]

The Nix and Zapruder cameras had different frame rates.  So somebody made them match up.

This is necessarily true because no two cameras [due to their wind up drives] ran exactly the same frame by frame.
 

[Royell Storing]

Totally not true, Storing.  Bootleg copies of the film were circulating in 1969.  The film was also shown during the Garrison trial, so your claim holds zero weight.

     (1) An alleged "bootleg" Copy of anything holds absolutely No Evidentiary Value what-so-ever. (2) Zapruder did Not view the Original Zapruder Film during the Clay-Shaw Trial. In FACT, Zapruder was unable to verify that the film he was viewing inside that courtroom had not been ALTERED.
                  Q - "Is the COPY you have here today Identical to the original or are there any Plates Missing out of This COPY?"
       Zapruder  - "I couldn't say."

[Steve Barber]

     (1) An alleged "bootleg" Copy of anything holds absolutely No Evidentiary Value what-so-ever. (2) Zapruder did Not view the Original Zapruder Film during the Clay-Shaw Trial. In FACT, Zapruder was unable to verify that the film he was viewing inside that courtroom had not been ALTERED.
                  Q - "Is the COPY you have here today Identical to the original or are there any Plates Missing out of This COPY?"
       Zapruder  - "I couldn't say."

Give it up, Storing.  You, as usual, have nothing. Abraham was not a stupid man, and he didn't know the film in detail the way researchers and students of the assassination did/do. 

 His answer to the question...you can twist that into whatever you want, but it proves nothing because we know that Zapruder didn't want anything to do with the film and didn't even want a copy of the film because it horrified him.  That you take three words and try to  mold them into something to fit your agenda is just more proof of exactly how desperate you are!

[John Iacoletti]

Give it up, Storing.  You, as usual, have nothing. Abraham was not a stupid man, and he didn't know the film in detail the way researchers and students of the assassination did/do. 

 His answer to the question...you can twist that into whatever you want, but it proves nothing because we know that Zapruder didn't want anything to do with the film and didn't even want a copy of the film because it horrified him.  That you take three words and try to  mold them into something to fit your agenda is just more proof of exactly how desperate you are!

He was horrified 150,000 ways.

[Jerry Freeman]

This is necessarily true because no two cameras [due to their wind up drives] ran exactly the same frame by frame.

This may provide details about older movies and their projection times.....
https://gizmodo.com/why-frame-rate-matters-1675153198

[Bill Chapman]

He was horrified 150,000 ways.

Not nearly as many as conspiracy-author profiteers... 55 years and (still) 'counting'

[John Iacoletti]

Not nearly as many as conspiracy-author profiteers... 55 years and (still) 'counting'

Which author profiteer got the million dollar advance?  I'll give you a hint:  your favorite cut-and-paste-without-attribution target.