In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[Bill Chapman]

Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.

Or have John add 'destroyed' to his OP
Might widen the net, possibly resulting in a 'deadlier catch'

[John Mytton]

Thanks for the heads up Bill. My post removed accordingly. Oppps better inform the others who failed to comply too. Keep up the good work.

I've altered the thread title to accommodate your post, sorry for the inconvenience.

JohnM

[Colin Crow]

I've altered the thread title to accommodate your post, sorry for the inconvenience.

JohnM

Not a problem.....Mark V (and maybe others) had mentioned the note destruction anyway.

[John Mytton]

Again, do you really expect somebody who was involved with any of this (if there is such a person) to simply come forward?

Hang on, you can't just answer my question with another question, it doesn't work like that.
I just want to know if anybody has admitted to planting or manufacturing evidence, can you provide a list?

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Not a problem.....Mark V (and maybe others) had mentioned the note destruction anyway.

If Oswald's note said he threatened to blow up the FBI, then that would have to be dynamite evidence for the Prosecution.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Not a problem.....Mark V (and maybe others) had mentioned the note destruction anyway.

No worries, I've gone back to the original title and people can discuss what they want. But maybe a thread at some point in the future specifically about destroyed evidence could be interesting.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Hang on, you can't just answer my question with another question, it doesn't work like that.
I just want to know if anybody has admitted to planting or manufacturing evidence, can you provide a list?

JohnM

Where is it written that I can not ask a question to get clarification about your question?

Anyway, you already know the answer to your question, so what's the point of asking it. To score some cheap meaningless point perhaps?

It seems you are reluctant to answer my question. One can only wonder why?.

Btw in another thread you show complete understanding for Bonnie Ray Williams not coming forward because he didn't want to get involved.

I don't think Williams wanted to admit to seeing Oswald, so what else was left to say?

JohnM

Williams didn't want to get involved, it's not Rocket Science.

JohnM

yet, in this thread, clearly to score some point, you make a big fuzz about witnesses that, for whatever reason, haven't come forward, as if it means something.

What's with the double standard?