Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 461565 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #483 on: February 10, 2018, 03:16:01 AM »
Btw, how much is "astronomical"?




A lot more than "close to astronomical"!



JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #484 on: February 10, 2018, 03:17:59 AM »
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.



Quote
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

So none of the other guys had any bruises? cite?



JohnM

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
« Last Edit: February 10, 2018, 03:06:43 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #486 on: February 10, 2018, 07:42:07 PM »
The report was posted in my series already. Unfortunately this site was hacked and it is gone. I will repost it sometime in the future, but the evidence is still there.

Detective Marvin Buhk's report to Curry.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #487 on: February 10, 2018, 07:45:26 PM »
Well then feel free to prove that these witnesses saw different men.

Claim the lineups were unfair.  Okay.

Claim the witness identification was wrong and it was not Oswald who they saw.  Okay.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #488 on: February 10, 2018, 07:48:20 PM »
No bruises or gashes on any of these guys' eyes, either.


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #489 on: February 11, 2018, 12:34:17 PM »
You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.


I rest my case.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.