Four times Toni Foster said, "The car stopped!"

[Steve Logan]

       Since when is a POTUS being assassinated on a public street in broad daylight reduced to an "Event"?

I'll just do this once. Are you trying to pick a fight ? Normally I would jump on the opportunity but to show I have a modicum of compassion I will continue to ignore your repeated examples of being an assclown. I understand how punch-drunk you have become from your two year long mental beating that Craig Lamson handed to you on a daily basis. Remember those days when you hung out in the Photography section and pretended you knew something about photography? It's a shame you didn't have a cornerman or someone that could have thrown in the towel for you. 

[Royell Storing]

We can add to the equation any undiscovered/unknown films that might be found later that would expose their alterations.

But never mind, "they" could have just re-altered the Zapruder film - and the others as well to be in sync with each other.

In conspiracy land "they" could do anything. No limits on what was possible.

          There is No getting around the Z Film being under Private lock-n-key for its' initial 12 years of existence. No one with certainty has any idea as to what we are looking at Now.  NPIC Image Expert Dino Brugioni made this clear.

[Richard Rubio]

          There is No getting around the Z Film being under Private lock-n-key for its' initial 12 years of existence. No one with certainty has any idea as to what we are looking at Now.  NPIC Image Expert Dino Brugioni made this clear.

Did Life magazine publish some stills of the film? That would mean we still saw some of the film.

[Richard Rubio]

I certainly can understand some apprehension about releasing the film. I remember watching a show Mort Sahl hosted back in the day before an audience upon the first airings of the Zapruder film in 1970-whichever year ('74-'75?) it was. People in the audience were moaning at the graphic nature of the film. Maybe? They thought that wasn't such a good thing to show the public?  I would not attach anything sinister to it. Question the decision, fine. Mort Sahl, on one of the Southern California stations back then, one of the independents, I forget, like KHJ or KTTV, channel 9 and 11.  Mort is still living.  A few videos on Mort, that would really be something if I could find that old show. There was a Conservative on it for balance, a sort of liberal and conservative hosted show.

Mort Sahl with Tom Brokaw, where were you when JFK was assassinated?

[Bill Chapman]

Okay... the slowing is obvious to everyone. It's line with what is noticed in the films available, and in line with the testimony of quite a few witnesses... even though some say it stopped.
So, here are the questions that every investigator should want answered:

1) Why does the open-top limousine slow down in a most perfect location for an ambush, or sniper fire?
2) Why does driver Bill Greer rubberneck toward the president until the very moment of the fatal shot?
3) Is this just a coincidence... or is it a planned conspiracy to kill the president?
4) What do we really know about Bill Greer?

Those are the questions that should burn deep into our minds, and should be at the forefront of every serious investigation...IMO

In relation to SS protocol, Greer screwed up. But he likely (as many of us would in that situation) wondered WTF was going on behind him. (Did he say anything about backfires or firecrackers? I don't remember)

You lot assign agency to every little detail. But incompetence needs no plan.

[Jake Maxwell]

I've read that he thought there might have been a motorcycle backfire or that he had a tire blowout and tapped the brakes...
I really tend to think that is his cover... He is looking steady toward JFK up until the fatal moment...

[Jack Trojan]

What makes you say that the Zapruder Film may not be the original?

Because what we see was edited and copied with an optical printer.

No, it's the same film that's simply been stabilized but I'm glad that it is redefining your reality.

Ya, the same original "edited" film. You are so naive re film analysis it's comical. Garbage in garbage out. The film was not simply stabilized it was masked. There isn't a single original, unedited frame from the Z film yet you claim it is a true representation of the film that somehow proves something.

The reason it looks great is because the original hand held shaky footage is mathematically perfect which just happens to be typical of the Real World.

Huh? WTF are you talking about?

Tell me Jack, how much more scientifically validated evidence do you need?

  You think that video was scientifically validated evidence? You have shown over and over that science and logic are not your friends.

Decades ahead of the rest of the World "they" were spending trillions of dollars so they could produce the advanced CGI workstations with enough computer cycles to render these photorealistic fantasies, how about that!

WTF are you talking about? You think it is difficult to remove a few frames from 2 films showing the same event? Piece of cake, especially when you don't return the original films.

So you're saying that the above films were somehow altered to create the exact same scene from two totally different angles and these alterations were accomplished back in the 60's, how?

I never claimed the Z film was altered to hide the limo stopping. Speed it up maybe, but I only called you out for claiming a highly edited 4th-party youtube video proves anything. And this coming from someone who knows worse than nothing about image analysis.

The question you LNers keep dodging is why Greer slowed down the limo in the 1st place? Where in the SS handbook does it say at the 1st sign of trouble, slow down, turn around and watch the POTUS get his head blown off?

Btw what happened to your backyard photo boasts, after I schooled you, you suddenly disappeared!? LMAO!

YOU schooled ME? Didn't you slink away when I totally discredited you re the backyard photos and your ridiculous notion that your fade gifs proved something? And how can you school me when you know practically nothing about any of this? I don't live on this forum like you do, so why would I need to return to a thread and re-school you when a diehard LNer never learns anything? BTW, do you still think that your morph algorithm tracks facial features like facial recognition does? And do you still think that they prove anything? Mytton ≠ Scientist!

And if you are such a glutton for punishment, go ahead and bump that thread you were talking about and I'll destroy you again. Otherwise, your defeat was complete and your responses were too inconsequential for me to even remember the thread or bother to respond to your BS. LMAO.

JTrojan