What did SS agent Kellerman mean by, "A flurry of shells come into the car?"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: What did SS agent Kellerman mean by, "A flurry of shells come into the car?"  (Read 82286 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Clear lack of critical thinking skills. The issue is what Kellerman believed flurry meant not what a dictionary says it means. Are you trying to say that everyone has a clear meaning on what flurry means?

 I doubt Kellerman looked at a dictionary before he testify to find the exact meaning of the word flurry.

Brian, your critical thinking skills are top notch.  Go easy on these guys.   Thumb1:

Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 783
Clear lack of critical thinking skills. The issue is what Kellerman believed flurry meant not what a dictionary says it means. Are you trying to say that everyone has a clear meaning on what flurry means?

 I doubt Kellerman looked at a dictionary before he testify to find the exact meaning of the word flurry.

Kellerman was the head SA on site.
He used the word "flurry" twice.
He was sitting in Kennedy's limousine...
Two is not a ?flurry?...
« Last Edit: July 25, 2018, 02:59:03 PM by Jake Maxwell »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014



Yep, just another eyewitness.



JohnM

              Like I said a while back, YOU would Never get seated on a jury due to your immediately discrediting ALL eyewitness testimony.  Likewise, your evaluating/judging the JFK Assassination.  YOU are prejudiced. 

Offline Brian Walker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
              Like I said a while back, YOU would Never get seated on a jury due to your immediately discrediting ALL eyewitness testimony.  Likewise, your evaluating/judging the JFK Assassination.  YOU are prejudiced.

As Royell ignores all the witnesses who said there were less than four shots, and there was no flurry of shots.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2018, 05:13:11 PM by Brian Walker »

Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 783
As Royell ignores all the witnesses who said there were less than four shots, and there was no flurry of shots.

Let's not ignore Kellerman as a witness...
Kellerman was the head SA on site that day...
He used the word "flurry" twice in his testimony...
He was actually sitting in Kennedy's limousine when JFK was shot...


Those facts alone should weigh Kellerman's testimony heavy in the balance...
« Last Edit: July 25, 2018, 07:39:35 PM by Jake Maxwell »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
As Royell ignores all the witnesses who said there were less than four shots, and there was no flurry of shots.


    I "ignore" no eyewitness whatever they claim to have seen and/or heard. Mytton is on record as to ALL eyewitness testimony being unreliable. THAT is an immediate DQ as it reveals a prejudice which prevents rendering an Impartial Judgement.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Mytton is on record as to ALL eyewitness testimony being unreliable.

Actually that was me.  And I stand by it.  This is well understood by people who study human brains and memory.

https://www.npr.org/2017/10/13/557424726/elizabeth-loftus-how-can-our-memories-be-manipulated