"Project Oswald" was madness !!!

[Walt Cakebread]

Mr. Parnell, please consider changing this in the header of your website's pages....
I am making this request to you because I am strongly invested in verifiable fact trumping the LN vs CT competition.
Did these weasel words, crafted by lawyers of the best schools and lifelong connections, actually compete in terms of scope, damage,
fallout, with anything John Armstrong has inaccurately presented?

IOW, from the standpoint of historical influence or impact (obstruction of justice ?), has Armstrong, DiEugenio, or any other prominent
voice of the CT camp deliberately deceived the American people to anywhere near this extent?:

Page 95 of the Warren Report: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0060a.htm

Mr. Parnell, you seem to be a "just the facts" guy, like I endeavor to confine myself to being/presenting as. If you are,
should you not take offense at the deliberate "All evidence indicated" fraud published on page 95 of the WR, especially considering the motive
for the wording was to attempt to eliminate even the possibility there were more than three shots and one shooter?

THE COMMISSION'S  KNOWING DECEPTION  AND MISREPRESENTATION  Is a ringing self-indictment,
The Commission's purpose from the outset of its (sham) investigation was confined to building a prosecution case against a dead man.

( Whom they had to have known was lynched to keep him from defending himself....and exposing the insane fiend who was behind the coup)

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Tom,

I'll leave it up to each individual if they believe the WC "deliberately deceived" the public or not. I believe that the WC arrived at the correct conclusion-that LHO shot JFK without assistance. As a political entity, any report could not have been written in a way to satisfy everyone. The mission of my website is to refute theories that lead researchers away from the facts in the JFK case. The H&L theory is, in my opinion, a waste of time as are other theories or areas of research. And I have had several members of the CT community thank me for my work. I appreciate the document (which I point out so as not to embarrass you that you did not locate specifically for me) you located and it helped my work in the Landesberg article which is one of the more ridiculous areas of Armstrong's work.

[Martin Weidmann]

Tom,

I'll leave it up to each individual if they believe the WC "deliberately deceived" the public or not. I believe that the WC arrived at the correct conclusion-that LHO shot JFK without assistance. As a political entity, any report could not have been written in a way to satisfy everyone. The mission of my website is to refute theories that lead researchers away from the facts in the JFK case. The H&L theory is, in my opinion, a waste of time as are other theories or areas of research. And I have had several members of the CT community thank me for my work. I appreciate the document (which I point out so as not to embarrass you that you did not locate specifically for me) you located and it helped my work in the Landesberg article which is one of the more ridiculous areas of Armstrong's work.

The mission of my website is to refute theories that lead researchers away from the facts in the JFK case. 

Who exactly determines what the facts are in this case?

[Jerry Freeman]

.... a waste of time as are other theories or areas of research. And I have had several members of the CT community thank me for my work. 

So "several members of the CT community [whatever that is] who wasted their time on "other theories" have "thanked you" for exactly what now?