Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 1229923 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1582 on: April 02, 2019, 05:43:42 AM »
So you have no difficulty accepting that Mr Frazier kept a potentially very significant piece of information to himself for several decades before finally revealing it? And---following on from this---that official statements and testimony do not necessarily tell the full story of what happened that day?

Good to know!  Thumb1:

I said nothing about whether I believe Buell or not.

Try to comprehend what I addressed instead of doing the same tired, old, predictable JAQer/CTer Conclusion-Jump Polka
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 05:44:36 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1583 on: April 02, 2019, 10:26:21 AM »
You have no evidence that there was a ?Calvery group? standing together as a foursome. It doesn?t become a ?fact? just because you keep claiming it.

John "I Absolutely Refuse To 'Get' It" Iacoletti,

The FBI statements of Calvery, Hicks, Reed and Westbrook indicate that the four South West Publishing Company colleagues walked from the TSBD to a point on the north side of Elm Street "about halfway between Houston Street and the Triple Underpass" and watched the motorcade together.

D'oh

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy  :)
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 10:31:54 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1584 on: April 02, 2019, 06:36:25 PM »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1585 on: April 02, 2019, 08:56:12 PM »
John "I Absolutely Refuse To 'Get' It" Iacoletti,

The FBI statements of Calvery, Hicks, Reed and Westbrook indicate that the four South West Publishing Company colleagues walked from the TSBD to a point on the north side of Elm Street "about halfway between Houston Street and the Triple Underpass" and watched the motorcade together.

D'oh

How does that mean that the four of them were all standing side-by-side?

It doesn't.  You're just assuming that they did.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1586 on: April 02, 2019, 09:01:53 PM »
Quote
The guy on the TSBD's lower steps who is talking with Iacoletti's "Glasses Woman" looks like Billy Lovelady to me.

I don't have a "glasses woman", but even if I did, there's no reason to think that black-blob in Darnell is her.


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1587 on: April 02, 2019, 09:07:42 PM »
I don't have a "glasses woman", but even if I did, there's no reason to think that black-blob in Darnell is her.

Iacoletti,

You don't remember referring to the gal wearing the "black blouse" and the "black" headscarf next to John Templin in Betzner-3 as "Glasses Woman" (even though they are hard to spot unless you enlarge the heck out of her face) because you didn't want to acknowledge that she is wearing that "black blouse" and "black" headscarf?

Really?

Or are you lying?

(Gasp ... did you go back and delete it?)

--  Mudd Wrassler Tommy  :)
« Last Edit: April 02, 2019, 09:10:22 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1588 on: April 02, 2019, 09:28:32 PM »
You don't remember referring to the gal wearing the "black blouse" and the "black" headscarf next to John Templin in Betzner-3 as "Glasses Woman" (even though they are hard to spot unless you enlarge the heck out of her face) because you didn't want to acknowledge that she is wearing that "black blouse" and "black" headscarf?

I've explained this multiple times.  Did you forget, or are you lying?

After enlarging the figure, I realized that there may or may not be glasses.  If you think there are then you should outline where you think they are.



Regardless, please stop referring to her as "Iacoletti's glasses woman".  That's deceptive.