Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Brian Doyle, Mark Ulrik

Author Topic: DiEugenio Promotes Prayer Man Scam To Congress  (Read 401 times)

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: DiEugenio Promotes Prayer Man Scam To Congress
« Reply #28 on: Today at 08:57:10 AM »
I cannot navigate the image posting for some reason...

Look above the empty Posting Box and you will see this icon,

Place the URL of the Image you wish to post between the [img] tags and Bob's your Uncle.

Do not post images hosted by Imgur.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 10
DiEugenio Promotes Prayer Man Scam To Congress
« Reply #29 on: Today at 11:00:52 AM »


Can't figure out how to produce a URL from the images in my "Photos" file...


The Davidson "High Key Filter" enlargement of Prayer Man in the 6th Floor Museum copy of Darnell shows Stanton's dress neckline and ends the issue...So much so that anyone who pursues Congress in order to prove Prayer Man is Oswald is guilty of incompetence and pursuing already-disproven evidence...The image is so obviously Stanton's dress neckline that Larsen was forced to invent the silly lie that it was a CIA forgery...Evidence-wise you cannot go from Davidson's "High Key Filter" image proof to Oswald being Prayer Man - which is why the Prayer Man people are avoiding obtaining the 6th Floor Museum's 1st generation copy...   



Online Brian Doyle

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 10
DiEugenio Promotes Prayer Man Scam To Congress
« Reply #30 on: Today at 11:09:56 AM »
DiEugenio wrote:


Quote
I would also have to cast a vote for the Kelley, Murphy thread that ended up being about Prayer Man.

That discussion ended up being a milestone in the history of this forum. And it was a long one.

It really altered some perspectives.  To think that the early researchers spent all that time on Lovelady and ignored PM.

I eventually found someone who tried to get to Garrison about this.  Bart Kamp mentions him on his encyclopedic site.  But that was about it for the early research on this issue. 


It is incredibly dishonest for DiEugenio to enter the general view he does above while ignoring what a trainwreck of farce and threat to the integrity of JFK research this theory was and his contribution to it...After all that occurred with this infamous subject he is still pointing to Prayer Man, giving it merit, and ignoring the serious problems it caused...And to add insult to injury, Kamp is given a positive word...As if none of what is in this thread had ever happened...A little banning and censorship can go a long way and Jim D doesn't miss a lick...
« Last Edit: Today at 11:12:42 AM by Brian Doyle »