CIA Wallets at Tenth and Patton

[Martin Weidmann]

I did. It wasn't there.

It's not my problem that you can't figure it out. This is a pointless conversation.
I found out a long time ago that I can't fix stupid

[John Corbett]

It's not my problem that you can't figure it out. This is a pointless conversation.
I found out a long time ago that I can't fix stupid

We're getting near to the point in the conversation where the CT tells the LN to find the supporting evidence for the CT's assertion.

[Martin Weidmann]

We're getting near to the point in the conversation where the CT tells the LN to find the supporting evidence for the CT's assertion.

No, we have already arrived at the point where a imaginary "CT" (in the mind of a fanatical zealot LN) has explained the evidence for two wallets and just about all LNs couldn't answer the simple questions asked, leaving us with Mitch who is always playing games and never ever presents any logical explanation or even a shred of evidence. In this case he hasn't even made a point beyond that he can't find figure it out.

[Mitch Todd]

It's not my problem that you can't figure it out. This is a pointless conversation.
I found out a long time ago that I can't fix stupid

Umm hmm. I thought so. Nothing.

[Mitch Todd]

No, we have already arrived at the point where a imaginary "CT" (in the mind of a fanatical zealot LN) has explained the evidence for two wallets and just about all LNs couldn't answer the simple questions asked, leaving us with Mitch who is always playing games and never ever presents any logical explanation or even a shred of evidence. In this case he hasn't even made a point beyond that he can't find figure it out.

The Weidmann method:

1.) Make unsupported assertion.

2.) Demand that the other guy find evidence for said unsupported assertion

3.) Whine that the other guy is "playing games"

 

[Martin Weidmann]

The Weidmann method:

1.) Make unsupported assertion.

2.) Demand that the other guy find evidence for said unsupported assertion

3.) Whine that the other guy is "playing games"

 

And there we have it....  this is what Mitch's games are all about.

He can't tell me what is wrong with the evidence I have provided, and he hasn't got answers....

I've played this game before with him and it always plays out the same way.. That's why I said it's a pointless conversation.

[Mitch Todd]

And there we have it....  this is what Mitch's games are all about.

He can't tell me what is wrong with the evidence I have provided, and he hasn't got answers....

I've played this game before with him and it always plays out the same way.. That's why I said it's a pointless conversation.

The Weidmann method:

1.) Make unsupported assertion.

2.) Demand that the other guy find evidence for said unsupported assertion

3.) Whine that the other guy is "playing games"

4.) When the other guy points out the games you play, whine some more.