No, we have already arrived at the point where a imaginary "CT" (in the mind of a fanatical zealot LN) has explained the evidence for two wallets and just about all LNs couldn't answer the simple questions asked, leaving us with Mitch who is always playing games and never ever presents any logical explanation or even a shred of evidence. In this case he hasn't even made a point beyond that he can't find figure it out.
The Weidmann method:
1.) Make unsupported assertion.
2.) Demand that the other guy find evidence for said unsupported assertion
3.) Whine that the other guy is "playing games"
