Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman  (Read 828 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1374
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #49 on: Today at 04:27:03 PM »
I didn't even cite Brehm's words. I cited what he was seen doing on the Z-film.

Sometimes a witness can be too close. It can create tunnel vision and lack of perspective.

 It can create tunnel vision and lack of perspective
.

You mean like this. You are interpreting what Brehm thought and heard that is contrary to what he said took place while he was standing there and watched it unfold.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4491
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #50 on: Today at 04:35:07 PM »
You are not explaining the dent, you are just hoping you stumbled onto an alternative explanation. You didn't. What on the rear bridge of the receiver can cause a dent with a dimple in the middle that makes the top of the lip flare out.



The image below is CE 543. It is difficult for me to tell from the photo, but if the lip is flared out it isn’t by much. The yellow circle is a round circle approximately the size of the mouth of the shell. The blue circle depicts an arc at a similar radius as the outside of the bridge on the rifle. The edge of the bridge could have made that dent in my opinion.




« Last Edit: Today at 04:35:57 PM by Charles Collins »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1323
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #51 on: Today at 04:45:33 PM »

 It can create tunnel vision and lack of perspective
.

You mean like this. You are interpreting what Brehm thought and heard that is contrary to what he said took place while he was standing there and watched it unfold.

I see Brehm clapping his hands after JFK had slumped following the first shot that hit him. I conclude one of two things. Either Brehm was oblivious to the fact JFK had just been shot or he was glad that JFK had just been shot. Which one do you think is the case?

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1374
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #52 on: Today at 04:51:59 PM »


The image below is CE 543. It is difficult for me to tell from the photo, but if the lip is flared out it isn’t by much. The yellow circle is a round circle approximately the size of the mouth of the shell. The blue circle depicts an arc at a similar radius as the outside of the bridge on the rifle. The edge of the bridge could have made that dent in my opinion.




No, It doesn't have to be much. It is a shell not an anvil. Somebody here suggested it was a stake mark. Maybe check that out.

 I thought you liked AI? You don't believe what it produced?

The bridge can cause a dimple in the center of the dent?

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1374
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #53 on: Today at 04:56:18 PM »
I see Brehm clapping his hands after JFK had slumped following the first shot that hit him. I conclude one of two things. Either Brehm was oblivious to the fact JFK had just been shot or he was glad that JFK had just been shot. Which one do you think is the case?

That JFK had been struck by the first shot just as he stated and he realized he had been struck by the first shot; hence he referenced slumping just like the other eyewitnesses.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4491
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #54 on: Today at 05:28:35 PM »
No, It doesn't have to be much. It is a shell not an anvil. Somebody here suggested it was a stake mark. Maybe check that out.

 I thought you liked AI? You don't believe what it produced?

The bridge can cause a dimple in the center of the dent?



Yes, it is called the contact point.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1374
Re: Dr. E. Forrest Chapman
« Reply #55 on: Today at 05:50:38 PM »


Yes, it is called the contact point.

It is called a fictional story. Maybe your rifle has a point on the bridge, but none of the others do.