Why would they recruit someone if they didn't know he had a perch overlooking the motorcade route. Did they just get lucky?
Free your mind, Grasshopper. Does a
patsy dupe require a perch overlooking the motorcade route? If he was in fact a dupe, he could have fulfilled his dupedom from anywhere. He would have been recruited as a dupe not because he had a perch but because who he was fit perfectly with where the Bad Guys were trying to point -
i.e., Cuba. The fact that JFK was planning to visit Dallas was known considerably in advance of 11-22 - indeed, before Mr. Dupe had visited MC or begun work in the TSBD. It may be that the TSBD was the best he could do at the time and then,
voila, turned out to be perfect. If Oswald were a non-dupe, pretty much the same logic applies. In fact, the sixth floor of the TSBD seems so Stoopidly Risky to me that I have difficulty fitting it into any plausible narrative, LN or CT, other than "Maybe the dupe will get lucky and actually hit JFK and our pro won't even be needed. If he's killed, we don't care. If he survives, we don't care. Either way, he serves his purpose."
When the student is ready, the teacher will appear.If Oswald was going to shoot JFK, why would he need to approach anybody? Why not just do it an not tell anybody?
Free your mind and enter into the bliss of non-dualistic thinking, Grasshopper. If the LN narrative were correct, he would not need to approach anyone. If he were already part of a conspiracy, however, either as a dupe or a participant, he would be informing his co-conspirators that the time was right and he was sitting in the proverbial catbird seat. The Bad Guys would then implement other aspects of the plan - a shooter in the Dal-Tex or County Records building, perhaps, or a guy in the storm drain with CIA-issued ice bullets, or Umbrella Man with his poison flanchettes, or ... whatever.
It is not an obstacle. It is an essential element for anyone positing Oswald was part of a conspiracy and not just acting alone. This is the one element that all conspiracy theories lack. Compelling evidence that someone other than Oswald was complicit in the assassination. For over 6 decades, CTs have used imagination in lieu of evidence to support their theories. If they can conceive it, they will believe it.
You are on the edge of enlightenment, Grasshoppper. "If they can conceive it, they will believe it" is right out of the Tao ("The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao, the name that can be named is not Lee Harvey Oswald"). You are merely repeating what open-minded sages such as Dan* and myself have cheerfully acknowledged - yes, a plausible conspiracy theory must account for Oswald in some evidence-based way. John Orr thinks he has done this, but I will reserve judgment until I more clearly understand what he is claiming. (*Mr. O'Meara is currently a probationary sage but is making solid progress toward full
satori.)
I really think that no more than five episodes of
Kung Fu would be sufficient to free you from the mental prison in which you are currently trapped.
"Live long and prosper." No, wait, that was Mr. Spock. Oh, well, whatever.