Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Time for Truth  (Read 33738 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #96 on: June 14, 2023, 01:13:31 AM »
Advertisement
So you expect Klein’s to have “some record of non-delivery”,

A mail order company's bread and butter comes directly from packages being successfully delivered and if a package isn't received by a customer, then someone would record the eventual outcome.
I don't know Kleins exact procedure because in the case being discussed there is no presented evidence of an unsuccessful delivery.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #96 on: June 14, 2023, 01:13:31 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #97 on: June 14, 2023, 01:26:17 AM »
A mail order company's bread and butter comes directly from packages being successfully delivered and if a package isn't received by a customer, then someone would record the eventual outcome.
I don't know Kleins exact procedure because in the case being discussed there is no presented evidence of an unsuccessful delivery.

JohnM

HAHAHAHA There is also no evidence of a successful delivery.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #98 on: June 14, 2023, 01:29:48 AM »
HAHAHAHA There is also no evidence of a successful delivery.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #98 on: June 14, 2023, 01:29:48 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #99 on: June 14, 2023, 01:44:00 AM »


JohnM

Wrong again. At best it's evidence of a very poor leap of faith based on no evidence whatsoever.

The mere fact that somebody is photographed holding a rifle doesn't mean he owns it, nor does it mean he received it in the mail.

Care to try again?
« Last Edit: June 14, 2023, 04:15:16 AM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #100 on: June 14, 2023, 01:44:29 AM »
Yes, if Oswald didn't receive his rifle then naturally he would complain and Kleins would be expected to have to some sort record of how they handled his non delivery but alas no evidence appears to exist. Meaning that Oswald's rifle was delivered.

But then you’re assuming that Oswald ever ordered a rifle.

I supposed you consider your imagination about what records would be kept to be evidence too. Everything that pops into your head is “evidence”.

Let see… if the postal service had shipped and delivered such a package they would be expected to have some sort of records of shipment and delivery. Meaning that it was never shipped and delivered.

Hoist by the petard of your own bad argument.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #100 on: June 14, 2023, 01:44:29 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #101 on: June 14, 2023, 01:47:54 AM »

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #102 on: June 14, 2023, 04:48:22 AM »
Yes, if Oswald didn't receive his rifle then naturally he would complain and Kleins would be expected to have to some sort record of how they handled his non delivery but alas no evidence appears to exist. Meaning that Oswald's rifle was delivered.



JohnM

This is all just speculation. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #102 on: June 14, 2023, 04:48:22 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Time for Truth
« Reply #103 on: June 14, 2023, 05:20:50 AM »
This is all just speculation.

Sure, I was posed with a hypothetical scenario by Martin and speculated on how a non-delivery would be resolved but as we both know, the reality is that the rifle purchase was completed as proven by the Back yard photos.
Read the thread and learn how Martin desperately grasps at straws to keep the rifle out of Oswald's hands, it's all very strange.

JohnM