Iacoletti v Bug53


Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Iacoletti v Bug53  (Read 2137 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7235
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2022, 09:49:10 PM »
Other people "believe" in Bigfoot.  What is lacking is evidence of the involvement of anyone other than Oswald.

People who believe in Bigfoot believe the creature exists because they have seen PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that such a creature Exists.....  Whereas people who believe that Lee Oswald murdered JFK have NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to support that belief.....
« Last Edit: December 15, 2022, 09:53:23 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2022, 09:49:10 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2022, 04:34:08 AM »
Other people "believe" in Bigfoot.  What is lacking is evidence of the involvement of anyone other than Oswald.

Or Oswald.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3894
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2022, 01:38:39 PM »
People who believe in Bigfoot believe the creature exists because they have seen PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that such a creature Exists.....  Whereas people who believe that Lee Oswald murdered JFK have NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE to support that belief.....

So you believe there is "physical evidence" of the existence of Bigfoot?  That explains a lot. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2022, 01:38:39 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2022, 04:59:51 PM »
There’s no physical evidence of “Richard Smith” either…

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7235
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2022, 08:57:51 PM »
So you believe there is "physical evidence" of the existence of Bigfoot?  That explains a lot.

Duh!!....  Would foot prints be PHYSICAL evidence?... Many folks have seen the giant footprints that were not made by any known animal.....

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3894
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2022, 01:39:06 PM »
Duh!!....  Would foot prints be PHYSICAL evidence?... Many folks have seen the giant footprints that were not made by any known animal.....

So you believe in a JFK conspiracy and Bigfoot!  That explains a great deal.  How about the Loch Ness monster and leprechauns?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2022, 01:39:06 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7235
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2022, 01:08:50 AM »
So you believe in a JFK conspiracy and Bigfoot!  That explains a great deal.  How about the Loch Ness monster and leprechauns?

No I don't "believe" in a conspiracy to murder JFK..... I'm absolutely sure that JFK was murdered by men who conspired to kill him and put LBJ in the Whitehouse.

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3894
Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #15 on: December 19, 2022, 01:55:23 PM »
No I don't "believe" in a conspiracy to murder JFK..... I'm absolutely sure that JFK was murdered by men who conspired to kill him and put LBJ in the Whitehouse.

Based on "evidence" like the red circles being a signal?  LOL. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Iacoletti v Bug53
« Reply #15 on: December 19, 2022, 01:55:23 PM »


 

Mobile View