_You have now acquired a good deal of egg on your second face
_You are pitting your speculations against people who were actually at Patton Ground Zero
_You have practically dismissed The Gang of 15 as not being important
One's eyebrows remain raised
_You are pitting your speculations against people who were actually at Patton Ground ZeroNo. You get your information about the people who were actually there from the Warren Commission, which is an appeal to authority
_You have practically dismissed The Gang of 15 as not being importantNo. It's you and your uninformed biased opinion that isn't important. As for the witness identifications, it still is and always will essentially be a mathematical impossibility that
all the witnesses, although they disagree with eachother on many other details, will nevertheless select the same man in a fair and properly conducted line up.
When 10 people watch a car crash before their eyes, you get 10 very different stories, yet you and your ilk blindly accept that it's nowhere near remarkable that all the witnesses to the same event all say they same thing, when some of them only saw the man for a couple of seconds. Give me a break!
The value of the witness "identifications" is further reduced by the fact that none of those witnesses were ever challenged by a competent defense lawyer, so that we will never know if their testimony would have held up under scrutiny.