U.S. Politics

Author Topic: U.S. Politics  (Read 478257 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3677
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3320 on: July 31, 2025, 06:17:53 AM »
Advertisement
Dear Steve M.,

Are you pro-Trump?

If so, how did you get so messed up?

What "abuses" against Trump were committed by the other side to "get" him, politically speaking?

Retaining Christopher Steele to create an 80%-correct raw-intel "Dossier" on him that was, unfortunately, marred by disinfo from his primary source, probable KGB agent Igor Danchenko?

-- Tom

   "What abuses.....?". How about the Colorado State Supreme Court? They OK'd taking Trump off the POTUS Ballot, and Trump had been convicted of Nothing.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3320 on: July 31, 2025, 06:17:53 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3321 on: July 31, 2025, 06:34:28 AM »
This thread is for discussion on United States politics: which includes local, state, and federal elections, important political issues, political news, and the Biden Administration.

In response to a 7/28/25 article in SJO Daily about former CIA officer Susan Miller and her "take" on Tulsi Gabbard's recent accusation that the Obama Administration had manufactured intelligence assessments about Russian interference in the 2016 election, Michael Griffith posted the following:

"It would be nice if [Susan White] addressed the actual facts in the congressional (sic) report that refutes (sic) everything she says. The report is very specific about what evidence was relied on to make their assessment [that the Russians had waged a massive influence campaign on the Internet to help Trump get "elected"] and it was weak, to put it mildly. Stronger, more reliable evidence that contradicted the [CIA's] findings were (sic) excluded. She’s the professional and the report is public information now. Address it head on."

. . . . . . . .

Comrade Griffith,

What "actual facts" in the Congressional Report that allegedly "refute everything she said" in the article are you referring to?

What "stronger, more reliable information" that contradicts the CIA's findings that the Russians tried to help Trump get "elected" are you referring to?

How was the information that the CIA relied on to make its assessment "weak"?

Do you deny that "former" KGB officer Vladimir Putin had his folks meddle in our election (not by trying to hack our vote-tallying machines and software, but by waging a large-scale anti-Hillary / pro-Trump influence campaign on the Internet) so that The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") could be elected our "President"?
« Last Edit: July 31, 2025, 07:06:56 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3322 on: July 31, 2025, 07:02:37 AM »
"What abuses.....?". How about the Colorado State Supreme Court? They OK'd taking Trump off the POTUS Ballot, and Trump had been convicted of Nothing.

Comrade Storing,

The Colorado Supreme Court correctly determined that The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") was disqualified from being placed on the Colorado ballot due to the fact that he had incited the 1/6 insurrection. The fact that its decision was overturned by the Leonard Leo-packed U.S. Superior Court doesn't change that fact.

Were you at or inside the Capitol on 1/6, Storing?
« Last Edit: July 31, 2025, 09:59:22 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3322 on: July 31, 2025, 07:02:37 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3677
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3323 on: July 31, 2025, 03:57:51 PM »
Comrade Storing,

The Colorado Supreme Court correctly determined that The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") was disqualified from being placed on the Colorado ballot due to the fact that he had incited the 1/6 insurrection. The fact that its decision was overturned by the Leonard Leo-packed U.S. Superior Court doesn't change that fact.

Were you at or inside the Capitol on 1/6, Storing?

    The above is what You consider "Due Process"? Now I understand why you address me as "Comrade".

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3324 on: July 31, 2025, 08:09:00 PM »
The above is what You consider "Due Process"? Now I understand why you address me as "Comrade".

Comrade Storing,

Concerns about "Due Process" are triggered by three things as they relate to an individual: Life, Liberty, and Property

How would Trump's name's not appearing on the Colorado ballot deprive him of any of those things?

I call you "Comrade" because you, "former" KGB officer Vladimir Putin, and The Traitorous Orange Bird ("rhymes with "Xxxx") seem to have the same vision for America.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3324 on: July 31, 2025, 08:09:00 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3677
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3325 on: July 31, 2025, 08:38:26 PM »
Comrade Storing,

Concerns about "Due Process" are triggered by three things as they relate to an individual: Life, Liberty, and Property

How would Trump's name's not appearing on the Colorado ballot deprive him of any of those things?

I call you "Comrade" because you, "former" KGB officer Vladimir Putin, and The Traitorous Orange Bird ("rhymes with "Xxxx") seem to have the same vision for America.

   "Fair treatment through the judicial system..." is due process. The Colorado State Supreme Court arbitrarily removed Trump's name from the Colorado POTUS Ballot. What they did is Politburo worthy. This is what you are defending.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2025, 08:39:24 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3326 on: July 31, 2025, 08:58:48 PM »
"Fair treatment through the judicial system..." is due process. The Colorado State Supreme Court arbitrarily removed Trump's name from the Colorado POTUS Ballot. What they did is Politburo worthy. This is what you are defending.

Comrade Storing,

Does The Constitution guarantee the same degree of protection to an individual's life, liberty, and property in a civil case as it does in a criminal case?

Do you think an insurrectionist's "pursuit of happiness" should be protected by The Constitution, too?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3677
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3327 on: July 31, 2025, 09:22:43 PM »
Comrade Storing,

Does The Constitution guarantee the same degree of protection to an individual's life, liberty, and property in a civil case as it does in a criminal case?

Do you think an insurrectionist's "pursuit of happiness" should be protected by The Constitution, too?

  "Fair treatment through the judicial system". Trump received Zero Due Process from the Colorado Supreme Court. Cut and Dried. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3327 on: July 31, 2025, 09:22:43 PM »