U.S. Politics

Author Topic: U.S. Politics  (Read 477310 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3676
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3312 on: July 30, 2025, 10:48:35 PM »
Advertisement
Why would Trump "campaign" on releasing the files if he knew that they contained something harmful to him?  LOL.  The Biden administration was corrupt to the core.  If there was a whiff of anything detrimental to Trump in those files, they would have leaked it years ago.  They illegally leaked his taxes even though they showed that Trump was in full compliance with the tax laws.  But dream on.  Maybe one day a hoax will pan out.  The only objective is to destroy Trump by any means.  Even if that means making up lies and conspiracies.

  The most revealing thing about the Dem's wanting to make an issue out of the Epstein Files is that it reveals that the Clintons no longer hold any sway in that Party. The Dem's are throwing Bill Clinton to the wolves. And with the males deserting the Dem's even after Obama made his barber shop runs, Obama is quickly going the same route. His opinion holds no value with the rank-n-file.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2025, 10:49:47 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3312 on: July 30, 2025, 10:48:35 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3313 on: July 30, 2025, 11:35:25 PM »
The most revealing thing about the Dem's wanting to make an issue out of the Epstein Files is that it reveals that the Clintons no longer hold any sway in that Party. The Dem's are throwing Bill Clinton to the wolves. And with the males deserting the Dem's even after Obama made his barber shop runs, Obama is quickly going the same route. His opinion holds no value with the rank-n-file.

Storing,

I'm a Democrat and I personally would like to know the names of all of the perps in the Epstein Files.

Wouldn't you, even if your boy, The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx"), is one of them?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3676
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3314 on: Today at 12:04:59 AM »
Storing,

I'm a Democrat and I personally would like to know the names of all of the perps in the Epstein Files.

Wouldn't you, even if your boy, The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx"), is one of them?

   Yes I would. ALL of this is validation of the Deep State. Including the FBI Trump/Russia role now being revealed.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3314 on: Today at 12:04:59 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3315 on: Today at 12:21:37 AM »
Yes I would. ALL of this is validation of the Deep State. Including the FBI Trump/Russia role now being revealed.

Comrade Storing,

"The FBI's 'Deep State' role in the Trump/Russia Investigation"?

LOL!

The only thing the Traitorous Orange Bird's (rhymes with "Xxxx's") lackeys have "revealed" recently in regard to Russia is the lameness of Comrade Gabbard's attempts to fool Americans into believing that there was no massive Internet-based influence operation by your boy, Vladimir Putin, to put The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") in office.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:26:59 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3676
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3316 on: Today at 01:11:20 AM »
Comrade Storing,

"The FBI's 'Deep State' role in the Trump/Russia Investigation"?

LOL!

The only thing the Traitorous Orange Bird's (rhymes with "Xxxx's") lackeys have "revealed" recently in regard to Russia is the lameness of Comrade Gabbard's attempts to fool Americans into believing that there was no massive Internet-based influence operation by your boy, Vladimir Putin, to put The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") in office.

         Check back with me whenever you get up-to-speed. You're way behind the curve.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3316 on: Today at 01:11:20 AM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3317 on: Today at 01:42:14 AM »
Check back with me whenever you get up-to-speed. You're way behind the curve.

Why don't you enlighten us, Comrade Storing?

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3318 on: Today at 02:00:40 AM »
If the supposed "Deep State" wanted to get JFK in 1963, remove him from power, they didn't need to shoot him in broad daylight in the middle of the street with hundreds of people watching. And then have to cover it up for decades (which is impossible to do anyway). That is sheer idiocy and only the most close minded conspiracists think otherwise.

How to get JFK? They could have used "lawfare", the same type of things some used to try and get Trump. Leak damaging information, falsify evidence, use the security powers to undermine him. This absurd conspiracy that people believe in is ridiculous. It can't be done.

Question: So why didn't these supposed all powerful people in the Deep State try that first? Wouldn't that be what you would do before shooting him in this ridiculous plan you think happened?

The idea that one group of people in the Deep State would kill JFK and then the next group of people - and the next, and the next - would coverup for them is...how can anyone believe this? We have Republicans in power exposing the abuses that were done to get Trump. Which is exactly what would have happened with JFK.

The so-called Deep State is the bureaucracy, the administrative state. It's filled with all sorts of people with different views and interests. The idea that it's a monolithic, single "blob" of people is simply false.

But the conspiracy Left and MAGA conspiracy Right foolishly think they do. Which is why we have the Morleys and the Becks and Stones and the Lunas and the DiEugenios and the Bannons in agreement. Two sets of people who otherwise loathe one another.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3319 on: Today at 02:06:20 AM »
If the supposed "Deep State" wanted to get JFK in 1963, remove him from power, they didn't need to shoot him in broad daylight in the middle of the street with hundreds of people watching. And then have to cover it up for decades (which is impossible to do anyway). That is sheer idiocy and only the most close minded conspiracists think otherwise.

How to get JFK? They could have used "lawfare", the same type of things some used to try and get Trump. Leak damaging information, falsify evidence, use the security powers to undermine him. This absurd conspiracy that people believe in is ridiculous. It can't be done.

Question: So why didn't these supposed all powerful people in the Deep State try that first? Wouldn't that be what you would do before shooting him in this ridiculous plan you think happened?

The idea that one group of people in the Deep State would kill JFK and then the next group of people - and the next, and the next - would coverup for them is...how can anyone believe this? We have Republicans in power exposing the abuses that were done to get Trump. Which is exactly what would have happened with JFK.

The so-called Deep State is the bureaucracy, the administrative state. It's filled with all sorts of people with different views and interests. The idea that it's a monolithic, single "blob" of people is simply false.

But the conspiracy Left and MAGA conspiracy Right foolishly think they do. Which is why we have the Morleys and the Becks and Stones and the Lunas and the DiEugenios and the Bannons in agreement. Two sets of people who otherwise loathe one another.

Dear Steve M.,

Are you pro-Trump?

If so, how did you get so messed up?

What "abuses" against Trump were committed by the other side to "get" him, politically speaking?

Retaining Christopher Steele to create an 80%-correct raw-intel "Dossier" on him that was, unfortunately, marred by disinfo from his primary source, probable KGB agent Igor Danchenko?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Today at 03:04:17 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: U.S. Politics
« Reply #3319 on: Today at 02:06:20 AM »