How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)  (Read 20186 times)

Offline Robert Reeves

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2021, 07:09:17 PM »
I don't think the country is above skullduggery. I'm saying that one form of skullduggery (filming JFK in bed with someone other than his wife and releasing the footage to the press) is significantly easier to pull off than another form of skullduggery (assassinating JFK, setting up a patsy, altering autopsy photos/x-rays etc). So why not pull off the easier form of skullduggery?

We've had a fairly good recent examples of politicians that have a near teflon resistance to scandal, the Clintons, Trump, Obama, Bushes. And if you have the media on your side you can get away with almost any crime imaginable, anyone remember Iraq's WMDs? If no one reports the truth how do you know what happened?

So what if the scandal you imagined doesn't take JFK down? what if he's so charming and beloved by his base of supporters that he cannot be shifted? You've just had a recent example of a POTUS that continuously managed to maintain a 48/50% base of supporters no matter what he does. Even with the majority of media against him. It's an almost similar example: Trump/JFK disliked and battling against 'deep state' operatives and institutions ... notably the CIA

Robert Kennedy Jnr says it himself. The CIA was out to get THEM. He's quoted as pointing the finger directly at 'rogue' CIA agents.


Kennedy Jnr says it was a 75 year vendetta. Started against his grandfather, removed JFK, and RFK. If you cannot accept someone in his position. I don't know what else you need to be convinced. A member of the Kennedy family is openly going on record saying what RFK and the family believed happened to JFK.

What you are suggesting is that JFK wasn't already being blackmailed during his presidency. I think there's pretty good evidence JFK's alleged romances were being leaked to the press. This was probably part of a scheme to bring him down. How many unsubstantiated women can you think of who've been linked to JFK? It's a lot. I don't doubt there are pictures of JFK in compromising situations.

The CIA had Operation Mockingbird for a reason, under the cover of the Cold War is was able to manipulate news in USA, and abroad, for its own needs. It was admitted by the CIA in the mid 70's that they had approximately 400 'journalists' working closely with them.

CIA Focal Point System https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1995/eirv22n50-19951215/eirv22n50-19951215_040-the_focal_point_system_for_cover.pdf

There's you growing up in a world where you don't hardly ever get to hear the truth - How comes many of the assassination doubters have relied upon foreign publishers to get their work out to the American people? Stone, Lane, Mae Brussell, etc. You couldn't easily get the financial backing to voice anti lone-gunman theories in USA because the truth is suppressed, why else was the Zapruder film hidden away for so long. So much for the free press.






Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2021, 07:25:56 PM »
We've had a fairly good recent examples of politicians that have a near teflon resistance to scandal, the Clintons, Trump, Obama, Bushes. And if you have the media on your side you can get away with almost any crime imaginable, anyone remember Iraq's WMDs? If no one reports the truth how do you know what happened?

So what if the scandal you imagined doesn't take JFK down? what if he's so charming and beloved by his base of supporters that he cannot be shifted? You've just had a recent example of a POTUS that continuously managed to maintain a 48/50% base of supporters no matter what he does. Even with the majority of media against him. It's an almost similar example: Trump/JFK disliked and battling against 'deep state' operatives and institutions ... notably the CIA

Robert Kennedy Jnr says it himself. The CIA was out to get THEM. He's quoted as pointing the finger directly at 'rogue' CIA agents.


Kennedy Jnr says it was a 75 year vendetta. Started against his grandfather, removed JFK, and RFK. If you cannot accept someone in his position. I don't know what else you need to be convinced. A member of the Kennedy family is openly going on record saying what RFK and the family believed happened to JFK.

What you are suggesting is that JFK wasn't already being blackmailed during his presidency. I think there's pretty good evidence JFK's alleged romances were being leaked to the press. This was probably part of a scheme to bring him down. How many unsubstantiated women can you think of who've been linked to JFK? It's a lot. I don't doubt there are pictures of JFK in compromising situations.

The CIA had Operation Mockingbird for a reason, under the cover of the Cold War is was able to manipulate news in USA, and abroad, for its own needs. It was admitted by the CIA in the mid 70's that they had approximately 400 'journalists' working closely with them.

CIA Focal Point System https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1995/eirv22n50-19951215/eirv22n50-19951215_040-the_focal_point_system_for_cover.pdf

There's you growing up in a world where you don't hardly ever get to hear the truth - How comes many of the assassination doubters have relied upon foreign publishers to get their work out to the American people? Stone, Lane, Mae Brussell, etc. You couldn't easily get the financial backing to voice anti lone-gunman theories in USA because the truth is suppressed, why else was the Zapruder film hidden away for so long. So much for the free press.

Excellent post, Robert!.....  Those who wanted JFK out of the way were reported to have said...."Those G--- D--- Kennedy's they are beginning a Kennedy dynasty,  After Jack,  there's Bobby, and then Ted....The only way to stop them is to shoot him out of office."

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2021, 07:37:42 PM »
We've had a fairly good recent examples of politicians that have a near teflon resistance to scandal, the Clintons, Trump, Obama, Bushes. And if you have the media on your side you can get away with almost any crime imaginable, anyone remember Iraq's WMDs? If no one reports the truth how do you know what happened?

So what if the scandal you imagined doesn't take JFK down? what if he's so charming and beloved by his base of supporters that he cannot be shifted? You've just had a recent example of a POTUS that continuously managed to maintain a 48/50% base of supporters no matter what he does. Even with the majority of media against him.

Bill Clintons affair cost Hillary the White House. Even with the media on your side, photos don't lie.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2021, 07:53:24 PM »
The public execution of people like JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King etc. is for everybody.
It teaches people to think what they're told to think.
Setting them up with prostitutes doesn't.

The public execution of people like JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King etc. is for everybody.
It teaches people to think what they're told to think.


Precisely , Mr O.      Well said.....   Just as horse thieves and other criminals were hanged in public executions in the old west....and "witches" were burned at stake .....  It scares the hell out of the viewers and keeps the faint of heart from speaking out against the "authorities" who snuffed the lives .


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2021, 08:09:24 PM »
We've had a fairly good recent examples of politicians that have a near teflon resistance to scandal, the Clintons, Trump, Obama, Bushes. And if you have the media on your side you can get away with almost any crime imaginable, anyone remember Iraq's WMDs? If no one reports the truth how do you know what happened?

So what if the scandal you imagined doesn't take JFK down? what if he's so charming and beloved by his base of supporters that he cannot be shifted? You've just had a recent example of a POTUS that continuously managed to maintain a 48/50% base of supporters no matter what he does. Even with the majority of media against him. It's an almost similar example: Trump/JFK disliked and battling against 'deep state' operatives and institutions ... notably the CIA

Robert Kennedy Jnr says it himself. The CIA was out to get THEM. He's quoted as pointing the finger directly at 'rogue' CIA agents.


Kennedy Jnr says it was a 75 year vendetta. Started against his grandfather, removed JFK, and RFK. If you cannot accept someone in his position. I don't know what else you need to be convinced. A member of the Kennedy family is openly going on record saying what RFK and the family believed happened to JFK.

What you are suggesting is that JFK wasn't already being blackmailed during his presidency. I think there's pretty good evidence JFK's alleged romances were being leaked to the press. This was probably part of a scheme to bring him down. How many unsubstantiated women can you think of who've been linked to JFK? It's a lot. I don't doubt there are pictures of JFK in compromising situations.

The CIA had Operation Mockingbird for a reason, under the cover of the Cold War is was able to manipulate news in USA, and abroad, for its own needs. It was admitted by the CIA in the mid 70's that they had approximately 400 'journalists' working closely with them.

CIA Focal Point System https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1995/eirv22n50-19951215/eirv22n50-19951215_040-the_focal_point_system_for_cover.pdf

There's you growing up in a world where you don't hardly ever get to hear the truth - How comes many of the assassination doubters have relied upon foreign publishers to get their work out to the American people? Stone, Lane, Mae Brussell, etc. You couldn't easily get the financial backing to voice anti lone-gunman theories in USA because the truth is suppressed, why else was the Zapruder film hidden away for so long. So much for the free press.

We've had a fairly good recent examples of politicians that have a near teflon resistance to scandal, the Clintons, Trump, Obama, Bushes. And if you have the media on your side you can get away with almost any crime imaginable,

WOW!! there's a lot of points that need to be  addressed in this short paragraph....

You're right Mr Reeves.....We American's have been brain washed into believing that our leaders are Lily white and as pure as the new fallen snow.   We , like a bunch of little kids embrace that fairy tale, because it makes us feel good, and it's much easier to accept than harsh reality.  All my adult life I have said that  p-o-l-i-t-i-c-i-a-n is simply another way to spell Criminal. 

Washington DC is a swamp filled with politicians and damned few statesmen.   The Snakes and skunks are their to fill their bank accounts with the working peoples tax dollars.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2021, 08:13:23 PM »
If the CIA was behind this, JFK probably would have lived.  They were never too great in the old assassination game.

If the CIA was behind this,

Hoorah!!  "Richard Smith" has admitted that he believes there was a conspiracy....

Offline Dale Nason

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: How the CIA would have got rid of JFK (if they wanted to)
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2021, 12:35:55 AM »
,with no disrespect......my god.....are you stupid? Really?