Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2  (Read 304538 times)

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4416 on: November 26, 2021, 10:18:41 PM »
Advertisement
Stunning new data on radical Republican policies shows how the richest workers got a lot richer under Trump's rule

Donald Trump's presidency and the Covid pandemic combined to make 2020 a remarkably enriching year for the highest-paid workers in America. Meanwhile, the numbers for the bottom 99.9% are, in a word, awful.

Just one in 900 workers makes $1 million or more, a new Social Security report on wages shows. My annual analysis of this data shows that this thin and rich group made 14% more money in 2020 than in 2019.

On average, the pretax pay of the $1 million-and-up workers increased by $305,600.That's after adjusting for inflation.

The share of all pay going to $1 million-and-up workers grew by a fourth during Trump's four years.

The other 99.9% of American workers got an average raise of just $76 each. But even that overstates how badly most workers did. That's because most of this minuscule pay increase went to the 1/10th of workers making $100,000 to $1 million. The bottom 88%, those making less than $100,000, got next to nothing.

The standard measure for worker pay is the median. It illustrates the typical pay situation because at the median, half of workers make more while half make less. Median pay in 2020 rose by a mere $26.

What a Surprise!

Put another way, for each $1 of increased pay going to the typical worker, each worker in the two-comma club collected $11,750.

Suppose $26 is the height of the heel of a shoe worn by a man standing on Fifth Avenue outside Trump Tower. The heel is 1 inch. The height for the highest-paid workers' pay would soar 315 feet above that 58-story highrise, for a total of 908 feet. That's a lot of heels. Plus one.

Trump has a policy: One for you, thousands for the rich; another for you, thousands more for the rich…

And don't forget, Trump's 2017 tax law gave the most highly paid workers a roughly 4% federal income-tax cut. Also, those workers tend to be the Americans with significant stock portfolios and Trump gave corporations a 40% tax-rate cut. So, they got a two-fer.

Crumbs for the Rest

You didn't get anything like either of those income-tax cuts. You got crumbs in tax savings plus the burden of $2 trillion in federal debt to pay for the Trump/Radical Republican tax cuts.

Indeed, if you live in the states with most of the high-paying jobs – California, Connecticut, New York, Maryland and the like – Trump and congressional Republicans increased federal incomes for millions of people. That's because Trump and the Radical Republicans took away your deductions for state and local income and property taxes and mortgage interest. The number of Americans who itemize deductions, including charitable gifts, fell by three-fourths after Trump's tax cuts for the rich and the companies they own became law.

More pay going to workers at the top is a long-term trend that began long before Trump. What's significant in the newest data is how much that trend accelerated during the Trump years.

In 2016, just 143 workers made $50 million or more. That number jumped 50% in Trump's first year as president and stayed at that level in 2018 and 2019. But in 2020, Trump's last year as president, the number of workers paid $50 million and up soared to 358, 1.5 times as much as under Barack Obama.

Monthly gross paychecks for those 358 highest-paid workers averaged close to $8 million each. A worker at the median pay would have to labor for more than 225 years to get paid what these workers made in a month.

More for the Top

Even more significant, the share of all pay going to $1 million-and-up workers grew by a fourth during Trump's four years.

Their collective pay rose to 5.2% of all worker compensation, up from 4.2% of total compensation in 2016 under Obama. That means most workers got a thinner slice of the American wage pie under Trump, the opposite of MAGA pledges to improve most incomes and just as I predicted back in 2015 and 2016.

The median worker in 2020 made just $34,612, or less than $3,000 a month before taxes. During Trump's four years, inflation-adjusted median income rose by 5%.

By far the biggest increase in median pay in this century occurred in 2014 under Obama when Social Security data show an increase of 3.44% over 2013.

The average pay for all workers was $53,383.18, or less than $4,500 per month.

More than two-thirds of workers made less than the average. The average is higher than the median because all those very highly paid workers skew the average upward.

One more awful fact: The number of Americans with any work fell in 2020 by more than 1 percentage point. In 2020, more than 1.7 million fewer people found any paid work than in 2019. That's the first time this has happened in all of Trump's life.

While Trump at his inaugural promised that every act he took would be for the benefit of the "forgotten men and women" of America, it was all just another con.

His actions, again and again, favored the highly paid, the already rich and, not least of all, the Trump-Kushner family.

https://www.rawstory.com/how-the-rich-benefit-under-trump/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4416 on: November 26, 2021, 10:18:41 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4417 on: November 26, 2021, 11:00:43 PM »
The January 6th Investigation Gets Closer to Donald Trump
Judges, national-security officials, and Liz Cheney say that the inquiry must proceed.


The congressional attempt to expose any direct role that Donald Trump and his top associates played in the January 6th assault on the U.S. Capitol is intensifying. This week, the House select committee investigating the attack issued subpoenas to sixteen former senior Trump Administration and campaign officials, including the former White House adviser Stephen Miller and the former press secretary Kayleigh McEnany. A federal judge roundly dismissed Trump’s effort to block his allies from having to testify before the committee, including his erstwhile strategist Steve Bannon. Legal experts suggested that the judge’s ruling could prompt Attorney General Merrick Garland to criminally prosecute Bannon for refusing to testify, a step that may induce others to coöperate. And, late on Thursday, the committee threatened to hold Trump’s former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, who spent hours with Trump on January 6th, in contempt if he does not testify on Friday morning.

Meanwhile, in a speech in New Hampshire, Liz Cheney, the committee’s vice-chair and one of the few Republicans daring to challenge Trump while seeking reëlection, said that the nation is “confronting a domestic threat that we’ve never faced before: a former President who’s attempting to unravel the foundations of our constitutional republic, aided by political leaders who have made themselves willing hostages to this dangerous and irrational man.” She added, “Political leaders who sit silent in the face of these false and dangerous claims are aiding a former President who is at war with the rule of law and the Constitution.”

The political reality, though, is that Trump’s hold on the Republican Party remains iron. A recent Morning Consult / Politico poll found that sixty-seven per cent of Republicans want Trump to run for President in 2024, a slight increase from several months ago. Other surveys showed similar numbers. “The Republican nomination would likely be his for the taking,” Nathaniel Rakich and Mackenzie Wilkes wrote on FiveThirtyEight. “He remains extremely popular among Republicans.” And opinion polls suggest that three-quarters of Wyoming Republicans plan to oppose Cheney when a Trump-backed candidate challenges her in the 2022 primary. Hours after Cheney’s speech, Trump declared, in trademark Orwellian fashion, “She is a threat to Free and Fair elections,” adding that the 2020 election had been stolen from him in “the Crime of the Century.”

The situation is unprecedented. A former American President refuses to concede that he lost the election. He has launched a public effort to drive the state election officials who certified his defeat from office. He continues to employ the lies and rhetoric that helped incite violence on January 6th. And this week an independent review alleged that thirteen former Trump Administration officials—including Meadows and Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner—campaigned illegally for him in the final weeks of the 2020 election. It’s increasingly clear to many observers that Trump plans to make every attempt to insure that he or an acolyte wins the 2024 election at any cost. On Wednesday, a hundred former national-security officials, Republicans and Democrats—including Christopher Krebs, the former director of the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity agency, who was hired and fired by the Trump Administration—published an open letter to Congress, warning that partisan interference, intimidation campaigns, and disinformation are rapidly undermining American democracy. “In the course of our careers, many of us have analyzed the threats posed by unstable democracies elsewhere, never imagining we would begin to see similar threats at home,” they wrote. “Sadly, that moment has arrived.”

Democrats focus on the fact that, among Americans as a whole, Trump remains broadly unpopular, with fifty-three per cent viewing him unfavorably and forty-one per cent seeing him favorably. While political analysts and legal experts lose sleep over Trump’s continued claims that he won in 2020, most Americans, according to Gallup polling, see covid, the economy, and poor leadership as the country’s three most important problems. Only one per cent cited the need for election reform. If Republicans win control of the House in the 2022 midterm elections, they would almost certainly disband the January 6th committee and end its investigation.

Members of the committee vow to achieve results before then. The panel plans to produce a definitive account of Trump’s actions and to propose laws that will prevent future Presidents from interfering in the Electoral College vote count. In a court hearing last week, Douglas Letter, a lawyer for the committee, said that investigators are seeking White House documents dating back to April, 2020, to help determine whether Trump engaged in a months-long effort to discredit the results if he lost. “We think, maybe, this all ties in with . . . the fomenting of it, building a groundswell of feeling that this election was going to be tainted,” Letter said. Timothy Mulvey, the committee’s communications director, told me that most witnesses called are coöperating. “Even among former Administration officials,” he said, “very few have flatly refused to comply with a subpoena.” He added, about Trump’s legal attempts to block the investigation, “The former President’s aim is to delay and impede our probe, but the committee’s work will nonetheless continue to move forward quickly.”

Stephen Gillers, a professor of law at New York University, said that Attorney General Garland may wait for higher courts to rule on Trump’s legal claims, but he believes that Garland will eventually prosecute Bannon. Gillers pointed out that if Bannon is not charged, those who were subpoenaed this week might be encouraged to try waiting out the investigation. “Garland knows that,” Gillers said, adding, “Everything we know about his devotion to the rule of law makes me confident that he will not allow that to happen.”

Ilya Somin, a libertarian legal scholar at George Mason University, predicted that the higher courts will uphold the committee’s right to subpoena individuals significantly involved in the events leading up to January 6th. “It seems to me that it should be a no-brainer, that Congress should be able to subpoena” witnesses, he said, particularly those who may have “played a role in an attack on Congress.” Somin doubts that the committee’s investigation will produce conclusive evidence of seditious acts by Trump. “I think sedition is a high hill to climb, unless the committee uncovers some dramatic new information,” he said. The broader political challenge is the country’s seemingly intractable polarization. Like the two impeachment trials of Trump, the January 6th probe may simply harden existing divisions rather than ease them. “Barring some dramatic revelation, I’m not sure it will fundamentally change anything,” he said.

Cheney, in her speech, said that the country is in “a time of testing” and implored political leaders to recognize the fragility of American democracy. “Will we defend our Constitution? Will we stand for truth? Will we put duty to our oath above partisan politics?” she asked. “Or will we look away from the danger, ignore the threat, embrace the lies and enable the liar? There is no gray area when it comes to that question. When it comes to this moment, there is no middle ground.” She is right that America’s drift toward authoritarianism continues, but it is not inevitable.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-january-6th-investigation-gets-closer-to-donald-trump

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4418 on: November 27, 2021, 04:18:34 AM »
Jared Kushner trying to raise Saudi cash after cozying up to crown prince while working for Trump



On Friday, The New York Times reported that former President Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner is trying to raise money for his new investment firm in the Middle East.

"So far, he is having only mixed success," reported Kate Kelly, David D. Kirkpatrick, and Alan Rappeport. "Qatar, whose leaders saw Mr. Kushner as an opponent in the administration, declined to invest in his firm, a person familiar with those conversations said. So did the main Emirati sovereign wealth funds; Emirati rulers saw Mr. Kushner as an ally but questioned his track record in business, according to a person with knowledge of the discussions."

There is one government in the region that is coming to Kushner's aid, however.

"The Saudis are more interested, according to four people briefed on their continuing negotiations," continued the report. "The kingdom's $450 billion Public Investment Fund is negotiating with Mr. Kushner over what could prove to be a sizable investment in his new firm, two of those people said."

In the Trump administration, Kushner was known as the former president's point man for helping to cut diplomatic deals in the Middle East, playing an outsized role in a series of agreements to make several Arab and North African states recognize the Israeli government — often at the cost of the United States legitimizing human rights violations by those countries. He has since founded an institute to promote the ongoing survival of these agreements.

Kushner has presided over some high-profile investment failures in the business world, most notably his failure to turn a profit on a large office tower on Fifth Avenue in New York City.

https://www.rawstory.com/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4418 on: November 27, 2021, 04:18:34 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4419 on: November 27, 2021, 06:21:00 AM »
Can you imagine this nut being a Representative in Congress? He would fit right in with the rest of the Qanon GOP conspiracy kooks.

QAnon congressional candidate sets up Bitcoin fundraising operation -- and it appears illegal: reporter



Ron Watkins, the longtime QAnon influencer who is now running for Congress in Arizona, has set up a fundraising operation that relies on cryptocurrency -- but one reporter thinks that Watkins may be running afoul of the law.

The Informant's Nick Martin writes on Twitter that Watkins this week started soliciting "no more than $2,000 worth of Bitcoin" in donations from his supporters.

As Martin writes, this is a legally dicey proposition.

"What he doesn't say is that the FEC prohibits anyone from donating more than $100 to a campaign when using Bitcoin," he explains, while adding that $2,000 in Bitcoin donations would be "20 times the FEC limit."

Watkins announced his campaign back in October with a bizarre video in which he invoked God in his decision to run while also doubling down on bogus conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election.

https://www.rawstory.com/ron-watkins-qanon-2655817602/

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4420 on: November 27, 2021, 10:02:22 AM »
TRUMP REPORTEDLY CALLED WHITE SUPREMACISTS “MY PEOPLE,” IN CASE IT WASN’T CLEAR HE’S AN ABJECT RACIST

“These people love me. These are my people.”
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/09/donald-trump-white-supremacists-my-people

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4420 on: November 27, 2021, 10:02:22 AM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4421 on: November 27, 2021, 10:24:09 PM »
The fact of the matter is, Republicans won't disavow these hate groups because these hate groups are their base and they worship Donald Trump. So, if they speak out against these neo Nazis then they will be alienating their own supporters and they refuse to do that. Also, a lot of these Republicans agree with these neo Nazis like Rep. Paul Gosar who held fundraisers with them. So, the GOP is aligned with these white supremacists and they defend them. Look how they made Qanon domestic terrorist Ashli Babbitt into their martyr. Look how they defended the white supremacist insurrectionists that stormed the Capitol. Look how people in the GOP defended Chauvin when he murdered George Floyd. Look how the GOP made Kyle Rittenhouse their poster boy for white supremacy vigilantes. Look how the entire GOP except for 2 members defended Paul Gosar for tweeting a violent meme against AOC. Look how they turned a blind eye to Asian hate when Trump was fueling it all through 2020 calling the virus the "Chinese Virus" and "Kung Flu". As a result violence against Asians skyrocketed all across America and the GOP ignored it. Yes, the GOP is a racist and fascist party and they will never call out white supremacy because that's who belongs to their party.               

Charlottesville verdict another missed opportunity for Republicans to disavow hate

Those who deny that Trump praised racists as “very fine people” are now pushing revisionist versions of what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6.




Despite a jury’s $25 million verdict against a group of white nationalists, neo-Nazis and organizers of the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia, "Unite the Right" rally, Republican leaders, once again, will not take the opportunity to repudiate the alt-right.

By now, this is an old story with a familiar pattern: denial, silence and historical revisionism.

Four years ago, after former President Donald Trump referred to some of the participants in the deadly rally as “very fine people,” Republicans had a chance to make it clear where they stood.

Torch-carrying bigots chanted, “Jews will not replace us!” An avowed neo-Nazi drove his car into counterprotesters, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer.

It was an easy call for a normal political party.

Republicans could have issued a historic denunciation of bigotry.

They could have denounced anti-Semitism.

They could have announced that there was no place for white nationalists in the party.

They could have drawn a bright, red line against political violence — and attempts to normalize violence.

Instead, for the most part, Republicans either looked the other way, kept quiet or went along with Trump’s gaslighting denials that he had, in fact, said what he said.

In many ways, the response to Charlottesville was a dress rehearsal for the right’s response to the Jan. 6 insurrection. The same group that adamantly denied that Trump had praised racists as “very fine people” are now pushing revisionist versions of what happened at the Capitol.

In the Charlottesville suit, we heard all the usual rationalizations and defenses: that it was about free speech, the violence was in self-defense and that no one could have known it would have a deadly outcome.

In the end, though, there was no glossing over the ugliness.

During the trial, one of the rally's participants, Michael Hill, the president of the League of the South, was asked about a pledge he had posted online. He was asked to read it aloud in the courtroom: “I pledge to be a white supremacist, racist, antisemite, homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe and any other sort of phobe that benefits my people, so help me God,” he read.

Then he added: “I still hold those views.”

For much of the alt-right, the trial became the focal point of their white supremacist race war. “Supporters of the far-right maintained a cheering section online full of expletive-laced rants against Black and Jewish people,” The New York Times reported, “while the defendants themselves weighed in with commentary.”

In the end, the Charlottesville civil suit will probably end up as a historical footnote, but it will nevertheless be a consequential one because it comes at a time of rising menace.

But this time, at least, there will be accountability for the leaders.

The white nationalists' courtroom defeat came just days after the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager who had shot and killed two men and wounded and third in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

White supremacist groups were quick to seize on the verdict as a victory and a call to arms. “White nationalist hate group has found ‘the hero we’ve been waiting for’ in Kyle Rittenhouse,” tweeted Michael Edison Hayden, a reporter for the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“In the communities of the far right, Rittenhouse has been ‘sanctified’ (joining the ranks of mass shooters like the Christchurch, El Paso, Norway shooters),” tweeted Alex Newhouse, deputy director of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies Center on Terrorism, Extremism and Counterterrorism. “The verdict is already being rallied around as justification for racial violence.”

On Telegram, a member of the Proud Boys exulted, "The left won’t stop until their bodied get stacked up like cord wood,” according to NPR.

Unfortunately, calls for violence are no longer confined merely to the far edges of the right’s fever swamps.

Just last month, at an event held by right-wing group Turning Point USA, an attendee asked, “When do we get to use the guns?” The audience applauded, The Atlantic reported. “How many elections are they going to steal before we kill these people?”

Prominent figures on the right have also penned fictionalized fantasies of racial violence. Kurt Schlichter is a columnist at the conservative website Townhall.com and fills in as a guest host on Hugh Hewitt’s nationally syndicated radio show. He has also written a series of books featuring what one critic called “white genocide paranoia and race war fantasy.”

Schlichter’s self-published Kelly Turnbull series, Christian Vanderbrouk wrote, “imagines a red state/blue state split, the latter now a progressive dystopia called the People’s Republic of North America, where whites have been impoverished and left homeless by reparations taxes.” In the books, Schlichter describes a brutal and hyperviolent “all-out war.”

In Schlichter’s books — which are widely praised on the right — the body count of progressives, minorities and even police officers is extraordinarily high. This can be dismissed as hyperbole and lib-triggering lulz … at least until the shooting starts.

That’s the lesson of Charlottesville and Jan. 6. It’s all cosplay, bravado and make believe. Until it’s not.

A mature political party would sense the danger and dial down the rhetoric. A decent political party would expel the bigots and extremists. A responsible political party would purge advocates of violence.

Don’t expect that to happen anytime soon.

Last week, Republican Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar (who had tweeted an animated video depicting the killing of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.) suggested giving Rittenhouse a Congressional Medal of Honor. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., sponsored legislation to give the teen gunman a Congressional Gold Medal. Other GOP members of congress — including Rep. Matt Gaetz, of Florida; Rep. Madison Cawthorn, of North Carolina; and Rep. Lauren Boebert, of Colorado — vied with one another in offering him an internship.

And just days after Rittenhouse was acquitted of homicide charges, the former president hosted him at Mar-a-Lago. We see Rittenhouse with Trump, making a thumbs-up gesture — basking in the adoration and endorsement of MAGA World.

The rest of the GOP will go along — or simply pretend not to see.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/charlottesville-verdict-another-missed-opportunity-republicans-disavow-hate-n1284587

Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4422 on: November 27, 2021, 10:27:26 PM »
QAnon leader was accused by wife of 'blind rage' in domestic violence arrest

According to a report from Mother Jones, a QAnon leader who has been promising fellow conspiracists that John F. Kennedy Jr. will soon return from the dead -- or hiding -- to lead the movement and help Donald Trump become president again, has a history of violence that includes an arrest for a domestic assault.

Michael Brian Protzman, who is known to QAnon adherents as Negative48, was arrested in Washington state's King County in 2019 for an "unlawful imprisonment – domestic violence" charge filed by his wife that led her to flee their home to a neighbor's house where she called 911.

According to research provided to Ali Breland of Mother Jones by Amanda Moore, Protzman -- who has told followers in Texas after the failure of JFK Jr. to show up "I am Jesus Christ" -- grew violent with his wife over going to marriage counseling.

"In July 2019, Protzman allegedly 'held [his wife] down on the bed, using both of his hands to physically restrain her, using one of his legs to brace hers,' and 'held her in this position for approximately two to three minutes until she told him that she would agree to marriage counseling so he would let her up.' When she then tried to leave the house, the documents say, Protzman grabbed her and prevented her from departing," Breland wrote.

The report goes on to note she later ran barefoot to a neighbor's home where she told the 911 dispatcher, "she is scared of Michael because he has 'blind rage' and she believes he may hit her."

"According to a police report, she complained that Protzman had recently 'been acting differently, not showering or working and believing in government conspiracies.' She also claimed Protzman had assaulted her before, strangling her roughly six years earlier," Mother Jones is reporting.

The report adds that, although the case was later dismissed "without prejudice this past June" it can once again be reopened if need be.

You can see some of Protzman's antics in Texas below via Twitter in the link:

https://www.rawstory.com/qanon-leader-was-accused-by-wife-of-blind-rage-in-domestic-violence-arrest-report-2655844013/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4422 on: November 27, 2021, 10:27:26 PM »


Offline Rick Plant

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8177
Re: Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2
« Reply #4423 on: November 27, 2021, 10:33:31 PM »
Brad Raffensperger torches Trump on conservative website in urging Republicans to move beyond 2020



Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger used an op-ed piece on the economy Friday to thrash Donald Trump for his obsession with overturning the 2020 election results.

The commentary -- prominently displayed at NationalReview.com-- dispensed with the customary deference Republicans give Trump at all costs. Instead, it began with this headline:

"One Year Ago, Trump Called Me an 'Enemy of the People.' Rising Costs and Inflation Are the Real Enemy." That was followed by this: "While some on the right remain focused on the last election, liberals in Washington are pushing an inflationary agenda that hurts workers and businesses."

Raffensperger's piece criticized Democratic policies on policy grounds as if this were an earlier century. But the old-school approach was prefaced by an attack on Trump more in keeping with the present day. Raffensperger used the occasion of the holiday season to go right after the nemesis who has rendered him a pariah in his political party:

"While most Americans sat down to eat their Thanksgiving meals last year, I was looking forward to a few moments of peace with my family during what had been a chaotic few weeks," Raffensperger wrote. "Georgia's county and local elections officials had already counted the ballots in the presidential election twice, including once by hand, and had just started the third and final recount. All three counts affirmed Joe Biden as the winner of Georgia's presidential contest.

"Yet my Thanksgiving was interrupted by news that President Donald Trump had called me an "enemy of the people" purely because I stood up for the integrity of Georgia's elections. I refused to bend to the pressure and, on America's day of thanks, this was the thanks I got.

"In the year since, a signature audit and numerous investigations into allegations of fraud have turned up nothing. No one has come forward with evidence of any widespread scheme to steal the election. The courts have reaffirmed the results in Georgia time and time again. A year later, I am even firmer in my conviction that Georgia's elections were accurate and secure.

"This reality has not stopped Trump and his supporters from obsessing over an election that Trump's own Department of Homeland Security called "the most secure in American history."

The op-ed went on to read like a typical Republican politician attacking Democrats over policy differences. But most readers are unlikely to remember that as much as the Thanksgiving broadside on the last guy.

Trump is facing a ramped-up criminal investigation over his infamous post-election calls to Raffensperger asking the secretary to state "to find 11,887 votes." Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is moving toward convening a special grand jury on the matter, sources told the New York Times.

https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-brad-raffensperger-2655838082/