Trump supporters and conspiracy theory - Part 2

[Robert Reeves]

Another "much ado about nothing".  How is a tweet saying "@Scaramucci should I respond to trump" supposed to "take Trump down"?

I like the way you arrogantly post such moronically blinded defenses of your political system being corrupted. All because it favoured your 'guy'.

If it's much ado about nothing, then why would C-Span have to suspend its political editor for inventing a story that he was hacked. When truthfully, he privately messaged a vocal Trump hater for advice on how to respond. Steve Scully ironically acknowledged his wrongdoing by going to such retarded lengths to deny it happened. You are so lame-brained John Iacoletti. You carry water for your own nations destruction.

[Martin Weidmann]

LOL.  Nothing happened except Trump was elected?  I think being elected President amounts to something.   That is old news though.  The point here which you conveniently omitted is that this "journalist" was caught red handed reaching out to a Trump hater for advice on the debate, got caught, and then lied.  Proving everything Trump has ever claimed about the media.  Everyone - regardless of political bias - with an ounce of decency should condemn such conduct.

LOL.  Nothing happened except Trump was elected?  I think being elected President amounts to something.

Exactly, the Hillary email scandal existed as long as it was needed to get Trump elected. Once he was elected, where did it go?

The point here which you conveniently omitted is that this "journalist" was caught red handed reaching out to a Trump hater for advice on the debate, got caught, and then lied.

So, reaching out to a Trump hater somehow is a crime?

Proving everything Trump has ever claimed about the media. 

So, one guy messed up and that's proof to you that what Trump said about the media is true? How shallow can you be?

Everyone - regardless of political bias - with an ounce of decency should condemn such conduct.

What conduct? ... Lying is something both sides are very good at

[John Iacoletti]

It's like 2016 all over again.  The dems are in panic mode.

Oh yeah, they're totally panicking!   



You get more and more delusional and unhinged every day, "Richard".

[Richard Smith]

The guy who was supposed to moderate the presidential debate lies about sending a message to a Trump hater for advice.  He then not only lies about this but suggests he is the victim of a hack.

Poor judgment indeed .... but if lying and being dishonest results in losing your job, what the hell is Trump still doing in the White House?

making a false statement regarding a crime.

What crime did he make a false statement about exactly?

He claimed that he was hacked.  The FBI was investigating.  If he lied to the FBI or law enforcement about being hacked, a false statement to them is a crime.  If you are a Trump associate and do that, for example, a SWAT team raids your home in the night and you face decades in jail.  But different rules apply to everyone else.

[John Iacoletti]

What crime did he make a false statement about exactly?

"Richard" won't give you an answer.  He never does when he shoots his mouth off and then gets called on it.  Just like he'll never explain how the Scully tweet was "reaching out for advice on the debate".

[Martin Weidmann]

He claimed that he was hacked.  The FBI was investigating.  If he lied to the FBI or law enforcement about being hacked, a false statement to them is a crime.  If you are a Trump associate and do that, for example, a SWAT team raids your home in the night and you face decades in jail.  But different rules apply to everyone else.

If he lied to the FBI or law enforcement about being hacked, a false statement to them is a crime.

"If"?   You claimed he made a false statement that was a crime.... so now it's only "if"?

If you are a Trump associate and do that, for example, a SWAT team raids your home in the night and you face decades in jail.

Said the drama queen

[John Iacoletti]

If it's much ado about nothing, then why would C-Span have to suspend its political editor for inventing a story that he was hacked.

Because he lied about being hacked.  But you claimed it was "trying to take Trump down".  How?

When truthfully, he privately messaged a vocal Trump hater for advice on how to respond.

Wow, are you a sock-puppet for "Richard"?  You're using the exact same language.  "Trump hater"?  You misspelled Former White House Communications Director.  It's no mystery that people who work for Trump end up regretting it.  He's a crook and a con man.